Significant differences (pointed by arrows) between the analyzed groups when comparing the cell height, width and aspect ratio (height/width).

Analysis of potential differences between case/control group regarding laboratory values.

Lisa C. Adams (3825940)
Falk Lübbe (5963552)
Keno Bressem (5963555)
Moritz Wagner (208633)
Bernd Hamm (43173)
Marcus R. Makowski (3825946)

November 2018

Analysis of potential differences between case/control group regarding laboratory values.</p

Comparison of information gain ratio of top features from expert-guided and CellProfiler categories.

Harish Babu Arunachalam (6597563)
Rashika Mishra (6597566)
Ovidiu Daescu (6597569)
Kevin Cederberg (6597572)
Dinesh Rakheja (346590)
Anita Sengupta (6597575)
David Leonard (6597578)
Rami Hallac (3533960)
Patrick Leavey (6597581)

April 2019

Comparison of information gain ratio of top features from expert-guided and CellProfiler categories....

The side-to-side comparison within the three studied groups in terms of limb symmetry index and absolute difference.

Aleksandra Królikowska (6298481)
Paweł Reichert (805468)
Andrzej Czamara (3279798)
Katarzyna Krzemińska (6298484)

February 2019

The side-to-side comparison within the three studied groups in terms of limb symmetry index and abso...

Significant differences (pointed by arrows) between the analyzed groups when comparing the measured and normalized optical density values at the highest point of the PCM.

Simo P. Ojanen (5143055)
Mikko A. J. Finnilä (4746984)
Aino E. Reunamo (5143049)
Ari P. Ronkainen (5143052)
Santtu Mikkonen (3224268)
Walter Herzog (713967)
Simo Saarakkala (332821)
Rami K. Korhonen (4429282)

April 2018

Significant differences (pointed by arrows) between the analyzed groups when comparing the measur...

Significant differences between mean labelled immune cell counts in the five group comparisons.

Antonella Maglietta (3148755)
Rosalia Maglietta (28782)
Teresa Staiano (3148761)
Ramona Bertoni (426332)
Nicola Ancona (28781)
Giancarlo Marra (436128)
Leonardo Resta (3148758)

July 2016

Significant differences between mean labelled immune cell counts in the five group comparisons.</...

Differences in dimension scores and overall scores among different groups, M (SD).

Xiu Zhu (6631358)
Yan Wang (15435)
Hong Zhou (29614)
Liqian Qiu (6631361)
Ruyan Pang (3554132)

April 2019

Differences in dimension scores and overall scores among different groups, M (SD).</p

Differences in discriminatory power between the approaches using either the absolute or the relative cell densities.

Cristina Della Beffa (443557)
Elisabeth Slansky (443558)
Claudia Pommerenke (150761)
Frank Klawonn (19279)
Jialiang Li (31220)
Lie Dai (52004)
H. Ralph Schumacher Jr. (443559)
Frank Pessler (52000)

August 2013

A. Ratio of ratios. Strip chart (1-dimensional scatter plot, log10[y]) illustrating di...

Measured size as a function of status cues in Experiment 3.

Abigail A. Marsh (202231)
Henry H. Yu (202241)
Julia C. Schechter (372569)
R. J. R. Blair (202250)

February 2013

Where row notations (a, b) differ indicates significant differences among groups.</p

Side-to-stide comparison within the three studied groups in terms of analysed parameters.

Aleksandra Królikowska (6298481)
Paweł Reichert (805468)
Andrzej Czamara (3279798)
Katarzyna Krzemińska (6298484)

February 2019

Side-to-stide comparison within the three studied groups in terms of analysed parameters.</p

Differences between groups and descriptive statistics for the dependent variables (Aula Nesplora).

Débora Areces (5634782)
Julie Dockrell (5634785)
Trinidad García (5634788)
Paloma González-Castro (5634791)
Celestino Rodríguez (4254733)

August 2018

Differences between groups and descriptive statistics for the dependent variables (Aula Nesplora).</...

Contrast ratio x acid etching duration (equal letters means statistical difference).

Nelson H. Koshoji (2217832)
Sandra K. Bussadori (2217826)
Carolina C. Bortoletto (2217829)
Renato A. Prates (288007)
Marcelo T. Oliveira (2217823)
Alessandro M. Deana (2217820)

February 2015

The arrow means the group statistically differs from the reference contrast ratio 0%.</p

Perceived size as a function of status cues in Experiment 4.

Abigail A. Marsh (202231)
Henry H. Yu (202241)
Julia C. Schechter (372569)
R. J. R. Blair (202250)

February 2013

Where row notations (a, b, c) differ indicates significant differences among groups.</p

Comparison of accuracy and feature dimension under different methods based on tree.

Weibo Wang (782424)
Jin Yuan (120922)
Bingrong Wang (14237672)
Yu Fang (219603)
Yongkang Zheng (14237675)
Xingping Hu (14237678)

December 2022

Comparison of accuracy and feature dimension under different methods based on tree.</p

Significant differences between treatment groups for each phenotype/generation/genotype.

Kelly Dew-Budd (2940027)
Julie Jarnigan (2940024)
Laura K. Reed (95452)

August 2016

Significant differences between treatment groups for each phenotype/generation/genotype.</p

Zhen Guo (68566)
Jichang Han (6263810)
Juan Li (146180)
Yan Xu (14594)
Xiaoli Wang (46677)

January 2019

The distance along the x-axis is the rank of distance value within or between groups. “Between” repr...

Analysis of potential differences between case/control group regarding laboratory values.

Lisa C. Adams (3825940)
Falk Lübbe (5963552)
Keno Bressem (5963555)
Moritz Wagner (208633)
Bernd Hamm (43173)
Marcus R. Makowski (3825946)

November 2018

Analysis of potential differences between case/control group regarding laboratory values.</p

Comparison of information gain ratio of top features from expert-guided and CellProfiler categories.

Harish Babu Arunachalam (6597563)
Rashika Mishra (6597566)
Ovidiu Daescu (6597569)
Kevin Cederberg (6597572)
Dinesh Rakheja (346590)
Anita Sengupta (6597575)
David Leonard (6597578)
Rami Hallac (3533960)
Patrick Leavey (6597581)

April 2019

Comparison of information gain ratio of top features from expert-guided and CellProfiler categories....

The side-to-side comparison within the three studied groups in terms of limb symmetry index and absolute difference.

Aleksandra Królikowska (6298481)
Paweł Reichert (805468)
Andrzej Czamara (3279798)
Katarzyna Krzemińska (6298484)

February 2019

The side-to-side comparison within the three studied groups in terms of limb symmetry index and abso...

Significant differences (pointed by arrows) between the analyzed groups when comparing the measured and normalized optical density values at the highest point of the PCM.

Simo P. Ojanen (5143055)
Mikko A. J. Finnilä (4746984)
Aino E. Reunamo (5143049)
Ari P. Ronkainen (5143052)
Santtu Mikkonen (3224268)
Walter Herzog (713967)
Simo Saarakkala (332821)
Rami K. Korhonen (4429282)

April 2018

Significant differences (pointed by arrows) between the analyzed groups when comparing the measur...

Significant differences between mean labelled immune cell counts in the five group comparisons.

Antonella Maglietta (3148755)
Rosalia Maglietta (28782)
Teresa Staiano (3148761)
Ramona Bertoni (426332)
Nicola Ancona (28781)
Giancarlo Marra (436128)
Leonardo Resta (3148758)

July 2016

Significant differences between mean labelled immune cell counts in the five group comparisons.</...

Differences in dimension scores and overall scores among different groups, M (SD).

Xiu Zhu (6631358)
Yan Wang (15435)
Hong Zhou (29614)
Liqian Qiu (6631361)
Ruyan Pang (3554132)

April 2019

Differences in dimension scores and overall scores among different groups, M (SD).</p

Differences in discriminatory power between the approaches using either the absolute or the relative cell densities.

Cristina Della Beffa (443557)
Elisabeth Slansky (443558)
Claudia Pommerenke (150761)
Frank Klawonn (19279)
Jialiang Li (31220)
Lie Dai (52004)
H. Ralph Schumacher Jr. (443559)
Frank Pessler (52000)

August 2013

A. Ratio of ratios. Strip chart (1-dimensional scatter plot, log10[y]) illustrating di...

Measured size as a function of status cues in Experiment 3.

Abigail A. Marsh (202231)
Henry H. Yu (202241)
Julia C. Schechter (372569)
R. J. R. Blair (202250)

February 2013

Where row notations (a, b) differ indicates significant differences among groups.</p

Side-to-stide comparison within the three studied groups in terms of analysed parameters.

Aleksandra Królikowska (6298481)
Paweł Reichert (805468)
Andrzej Czamara (3279798)
Katarzyna Krzemińska (6298484)

February 2019

Side-to-stide comparison within the three studied groups in terms of analysed parameters.</p

Differences between groups and descriptive statistics for the dependent variables (Aula Nesplora).

Débora Areces (5634782)
Julie Dockrell (5634785)
Trinidad García (5634788)
Paloma González-Castro (5634791)
Celestino Rodríguez (4254733)

August 2018

Differences between groups and descriptive statistics for the dependent variables (Aula Nesplora).</...

Contrast ratio x acid etching duration (equal letters means statistical difference).

Nelson H. Koshoji (2217832)
Sandra K. Bussadori (2217826)
Carolina C. Bortoletto (2217829)
Renato A. Prates (288007)
Marcelo T. Oliveira (2217823)
Alessandro M. Deana (2217820)

February 2015

The arrow means the group statistically differs from the reference contrast ratio 0%.</p

Perceived size as a function of status cues in Experiment 4.

Abigail A. Marsh (202231)
Henry H. Yu (202241)
Julia C. Schechter (372569)
R. J. R. Blair (202250)

February 2013

Where row notations (a, b, c) differ indicates significant differences among groups.</p

Comparison of accuracy and feature dimension under different methods based on tree.

Weibo Wang (782424)
Jin Yuan (120922)
Bingrong Wang (14237672)
Yu Fang (219603)
Yongkang Zheng (14237675)
Xingping Hu (14237678)

December 2022

Comparison of accuracy and feature dimension under different methods based on tree.</p

Significant differences between treatment groups for each phenotype/generation/genotype.

Kelly Dew-Budd (2940027)
Julie Jarnigan (2940024)
Laura K. Reed (95452)

August 2016

Significant differences between treatment groups for each phenotype/generation/genotype.</p

Zhen Guo (68566)
Jichang Han (6263810)
Juan Li (146180)
Yan Xu (14594)
Xiaoli Wang (46677)

January 2019

The distance along the x-axis is the rank of distance value within or between groups. “Between” repr...

Analysis of potential differences between case/control group regarding laboratory values.

Lisa C. Adams (3825940)
Falk Lübbe (5963552)
Keno Bressem (5963555)
Moritz Wagner (208633)
Bernd Hamm (43173)
Marcus R. Makowski (3825946)

November 2018

Analysis of potential differences between case/control group regarding laboratory values.</p

Comparison of information gain ratio of top features from expert-guided and CellProfiler categories.

Harish Babu Arunachalam (6597563)
Rashika Mishra (6597566)
Ovidiu Daescu (6597569)
Kevin Cederberg (6597572)
Dinesh Rakheja (346590)
Anita Sengupta (6597575)
David Leonard (6597578)
Rami Hallac (3533960)
Patrick Leavey (6597581)

April 2019

Comparison of information gain ratio of top features from expert-guided and CellProfiler categories....

The side-to-side comparison within the three studied groups in terms of limb symmetry index and absolute difference.

Aleksandra Królikowska (6298481)
Paweł Reichert (805468)
Andrzej Czamara (3279798)
Katarzyna Krzemińska (6298484)

February 2019

The side-to-side comparison within the three studied groups in terms of limb symmetry index and abso...

Significant differences (pointed by arrows) between the analyzed groups when comparing the cell height, width and aspect ratio (height/width).

Abstract

Extracted data

Significant differences (pointed by arrows) between the analyzed groups when comparing the cell height, width and aspect ratio (height/width).

Abstract

Extracted data

Topics

Related items

Topics

Related items