Conceptual change can occur for a variety of reasons; some more scientifically significant than others. The 2006 definition of ‘planet’, which saw Pluto reclassified as a dwarf planet, is an example toward the more mundane end of the scale. I argue however that this case serves as a useful example of a related phenomenon, whereby what appears to be a single kind term conceals two or more distinct concepts with independent scientific utility. I examine the historical background to this case, as a template for developing additional evidence for pluralist approaches to conceptual disputes within science and elsewhere
In the recent debate about scientific concepts, pluralists claim that scientists can legitimately us...
In “Moons Are Planets: Scientific Usefulness Versus Cultural Teleology in the Taxonomy of Planetary ...
There is a sense in which pluralism needs no advocate. It is enough to take a quick look at contempo...
ABSTRACT In 2006, for the first time in its history, the International Astronomical Union defined th...
Pluto had its classification changed in 2006, from planet to “dwarf planet”. This change had great i...
The need for an explicit and exact definition of a planet has arise out of the growing rate of disco...
Many astronomers seem to believe that we have discovered that Pluto is not a planet. I contest this ...
International audienceThis contribution examines the formation, evolution and use of terms in astron...
Scientific discoveries about Pluto and the rest of the universe led scientists to question Pluto’s s...
Science’s view of our planetary system was fundamentally restructured by the 1990s discovery of the ...
When the International Astronomical Union (IAU) adopted a new definition of a "planet" in August 200...
Nearly 100 years ago, astronomers hypothesized that a large celestial object, nicknamed “Planet X,” ...
Many astronomers seem to believe that we have discovered that Pluto is not a planet. But this is not...
In this paper, we demonstrate how a systematic taxonomy of stances can help elucidate two classic de...
Practices of concept-revision among scientists seem to indicate that concepts can be improved. In 20...
In the recent debate about scientific concepts, pluralists claim that scientists can legitimately us...
In “Moons Are Planets: Scientific Usefulness Versus Cultural Teleology in the Taxonomy of Planetary ...
There is a sense in which pluralism needs no advocate. It is enough to take a quick look at contempo...
ABSTRACT In 2006, for the first time in its history, the International Astronomical Union defined th...
Pluto had its classification changed in 2006, from planet to “dwarf planet”. This change had great i...
The need for an explicit and exact definition of a planet has arise out of the growing rate of disco...
Many astronomers seem to believe that we have discovered that Pluto is not a planet. I contest this ...
International audienceThis contribution examines the formation, evolution and use of terms in astron...
Scientific discoveries about Pluto and the rest of the universe led scientists to question Pluto’s s...
Science’s view of our planetary system was fundamentally restructured by the 1990s discovery of the ...
When the International Astronomical Union (IAU) adopted a new definition of a "planet" in August 200...
Nearly 100 years ago, astronomers hypothesized that a large celestial object, nicknamed “Planet X,” ...
Many astronomers seem to believe that we have discovered that Pluto is not a planet. But this is not...
In this paper, we demonstrate how a systematic taxonomy of stances can help elucidate two classic de...
Practices of concept-revision among scientists seem to indicate that concepts can be improved. In 20...
In the recent debate about scientific concepts, pluralists claim that scientists can legitimately us...
In “Moons Are Planets: Scientific Usefulness Versus Cultural Teleology in the Taxonomy of Planetary ...
There is a sense in which pluralism needs no advocate. It is enough to take a quick look at contempo...