This paper refines the Berger and Ofek (1995) methodology to estimate the valuation discount of multi-segment firms in Australia between 1988 and 1998. Evidence is found that based on earnings before tax, the sample of multi-segment firms traded at a 29 per cent greater discount than a comparable portfolio of single segment firms over the sample period. To explain the results further analysis shows that the valuation discount was driven by poorly performing multi-segment firms rather than multi-segment firms per se. This raises questions about studies that conclude that diversification is value destroying
I examine whether the discount of diversified firms can actually be attributed to diversification it...
Empirical studies show that a large portion of the diversification discount can be explained by cont...
This paper analyses the association between diversification and firm performance in a sample of up t...
This paper refines the Berger and Ofek (1995) methodology to estimate the valuation discount of mult...
This paper refines the Berger and Ofek (1995) methodology to approximate the market value of diversi...
The majority of Australian firms listed on the Australian Stock Exchange are multi-segment rather th...
Diversified firms trade at a discount relatively to similar single-segment firms. We argue in this p...
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the existence of a diversification discount ...
Using recent econometric developments about causal inference, I examine whether diversification dest...
Using a sample of 45,283 firm year observations between 1993–2012, I examine the influence of differ...
For a sample of diversified firms, I investigate the impact of the segment reporting rule change fro...
Recent empirical studies document the average industrially diversified firm trades at a discount tha...
In 1997, SFAS 131 established a new segment-reporting standard for US public companies. Using measur...
The authors examine how the valuation multiples assigned to the equity of Canadian-listed firms comp...
Existing literature argues that disparity in investment opportunities within diversified firms can e...
I examine whether the discount of diversified firms can actually be attributed to diversification it...
Empirical studies show that a large portion of the diversification discount can be explained by cont...
This paper analyses the association between diversification and firm performance in a sample of up t...
This paper refines the Berger and Ofek (1995) methodology to estimate the valuation discount of mult...
This paper refines the Berger and Ofek (1995) methodology to approximate the market value of diversi...
The majority of Australian firms listed on the Australian Stock Exchange are multi-segment rather th...
Diversified firms trade at a discount relatively to similar single-segment firms. We argue in this p...
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the existence of a diversification discount ...
Using recent econometric developments about causal inference, I examine whether diversification dest...
Using a sample of 45,283 firm year observations between 1993–2012, I examine the influence of differ...
For a sample of diversified firms, I investigate the impact of the segment reporting rule change fro...
Recent empirical studies document the average industrially diversified firm trades at a discount tha...
In 1997, SFAS 131 established a new segment-reporting standard for US public companies. Using measur...
The authors examine how the valuation multiples assigned to the equity of Canadian-listed firms comp...
Existing literature argues that disparity in investment opportunities within diversified firms can e...
I examine whether the discount of diversified firms can actually be attributed to diversification it...
Empirical studies show that a large portion of the diversification discount can be explained by cont...
This paper analyses the association between diversification and firm performance in a sample of up t...