Sir John Latham served as Chief Justice of the High Court from 1935 to 1952, his appointment to the bench following closely on his earlier career in conservative politics. While publicly, Latham's conduct as Chief Justice conformed to the general norms of judicial behaviour - in particular the requirements of judicial independence and impartiality - privately he remained involved in the political world. As this article shows, almost from the beginning of his time as Chief Justice, Latham clandestinely provided advice to federal government and actively communicated with political contacts about sensitive and partisan issues. Building on the work of Clem Lloyd, the article exposes the sweep of Latham's extra-judicial advising before, during a...
Charles Evans Hughes ascended the bench as Chief Justice of the United States in February 1930 in th...
In mid-1950s Britain two significant events occurred in respect of the doctrine of judicial neutrali...
This article is a contribution to the dialogue between Justice Michael Kirby and John Gava on the na...
The thesis seeks to shed light on the extent to which Sir John Latham's personal or political convic...
The Latham Court’s constitutional decision-making was characterised by stark contrasts: deference to...
A paper on the extent to which war justifies 'special cases' of extra-judicial service by Australian...
This article examines Stanley Melbourne Bruce\u27s role as Australian high commissioner in London du...
This article considers the process of nominating and electing candidates to the International Court ...
The conventional wisdom is that, with some important exceptions, the justices of the High Court of A...
This Article was presented and is written in honour of Professor Richard Kay, and in great admiratio...
In this article we seek to address in combination two of the themes suggested for this thematic issu...
Starting in 1920, this book traces the development of judicial attitudes to the exercise of power by...
Of all Chief Justices in Australia in the 19th century, none so demeaned the office as did Sir Henry...
There is a common perception that, prior to the exclusion of serving judges from the House of Lords ...
This article makes four principal claims. The first is that the justices of the Hughes Court often c...
Charles Evans Hughes ascended the bench as Chief Justice of the United States in February 1930 in th...
In mid-1950s Britain two significant events occurred in respect of the doctrine of judicial neutrali...
This article is a contribution to the dialogue between Justice Michael Kirby and John Gava on the na...
The thesis seeks to shed light on the extent to which Sir John Latham's personal or political convic...
The Latham Court’s constitutional decision-making was characterised by stark contrasts: deference to...
A paper on the extent to which war justifies 'special cases' of extra-judicial service by Australian...
This article examines Stanley Melbourne Bruce\u27s role as Australian high commissioner in London du...
This article considers the process of nominating and electing candidates to the International Court ...
The conventional wisdom is that, with some important exceptions, the justices of the High Court of A...
This Article was presented and is written in honour of Professor Richard Kay, and in great admiratio...
In this article we seek to address in combination two of the themes suggested for this thematic issu...
Starting in 1920, this book traces the development of judicial attitudes to the exercise of power by...
Of all Chief Justices in Australia in the 19th century, none so demeaned the office as did Sir Henry...
There is a common perception that, prior to the exclusion of serving judges from the House of Lords ...
This article makes four principal claims. The first is that the justices of the Hughes Court often c...
Charles Evans Hughes ascended the bench as Chief Justice of the United States in February 1930 in th...
In mid-1950s Britain two significant events occurred in respect of the doctrine of judicial neutrali...
This article is a contribution to the dialogue between Justice Michael Kirby and John Gava on the na...