The principle of non-combatant immunity protects non-combatants against intentional attacks in war. It is the most widely endorsed and deeply held moral constraint on the conduct of war. And yet it is difficult to justify. Recent developments in just wa
The fifteen new essays collected in this volume address questions concerning the ethics of self-defe...
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in South African Journal ...
In this chapter we will look at two jus in bello constraints that restrict the amount of force comba...
The principle of non-combatant immunity protects non-combatants against intentional attacks in war. ...
Moral philosophers and the international political community alike have traditionally valued the liv...
Abstract: The principle of noncombatant immunity prohibits warring parties from int...
The reductivist view of war holds that the moral rules of killing in war can be reduced to the moral...
This paper explores the relationship between the morality of war and the law of war. The focus is on...
Conventional just war theory�grounded in the founders of public international law and most prominent...
Civilian Immunity (“Immunity”) is the legal and moral protection that civilians enjoy against the ef...
Notion of direct participation in hostilities has been a complex and contentious phenomenon within t...
The combatant soldier on the battlefield remains protected from any claim in negligence by the doctr...
This paper investigates the question of legitimate targets in war and the traditional jus in bello p...
Is it ever justifiable to target non-combatants deliberately? This article assesses Michael Walzer's...
This article suggests that the best available normative framework for guiding conduct in war rests o...
The fifteen new essays collected in this volume address questions concerning the ethics of self-defe...
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in South African Journal ...
In this chapter we will look at two jus in bello constraints that restrict the amount of force comba...
The principle of non-combatant immunity protects non-combatants against intentional attacks in war. ...
Moral philosophers and the international political community alike have traditionally valued the liv...
Abstract: The principle of noncombatant immunity prohibits warring parties from int...
The reductivist view of war holds that the moral rules of killing in war can be reduced to the moral...
This paper explores the relationship between the morality of war and the law of war. The focus is on...
Conventional just war theory�grounded in the founders of public international law and most prominent...
Civilian Immunity (“Immunity”) is the legal and moral protection that civilians enjoy against the ef...
Notion of direct participation in hostilities has been a complex and contentious phenomenon within t...
The combatant soldier on the battlefield remains protected from any claim in negligence by the doctr...
This paper investigates the question of legitimate targets in war and the traditional jus in bello p...
Is it ever justifiable to target non-combatants deliberately? This article assesses Michael Walzer's...
This article suggests that the best available normative framework for guiding conduct in war rests o...
The fifteen new essays collected in this volume address questions concerning the ethics of self-defe...
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in South African Journal ...
In this chapter we will look at two jus in bello constraints that restrict the amount of force comba...
DOI
Add to ORKG