[[alternative]]The study of learning performance in different teaching methods and spatial perception abilities at the course of architectural facilities for the architectural students in the technological college

博士工業教育與技術學系[[abstract]]本研究旨在探討不同教學方法與空間知覺能力對高等技職校院建築系學生建築設備學學習成效之影響，為達研究目的，本研究採取不等組準實驗研究法進行實徵性研究。所使用之研究工具包括建築設備學習態度量表、建築空間知覺能力量表、建築設備學學習成就前後測量表、建築技術實務能力評量檢核表；以及問題導向學習教學教材。 實驗教學對象為朝陽科技大學建築學系九十二學年度第一及第二學期修習建築設備學之學生，基於實施問題導向學習採小班方式較易於討論，分別將第一、第二學期之修課學生再分派為實驗組及控制組；有效總樣本數為97人，實驗組47人，控制組50人。實驗組採用問題導向學習教學方法為依據問題導向學習教學精神，引用Maastricht 大學醫學課程之seven-jump問題導向教學模式，進行修正設計教學活動及教學模式以進行教學，而控制組採用講述式教學。 所得資料以使用單因子多變量共變數分析、單因子多變量變異數分析；本研究之主要結果為： 一、不同入學方式之學習者，在建築設備學學習成效具顯著差異。 二、具較長建築工作經歷之學習者，在建築技術實務能力顯著具有較高成就。 三、不同建築年資之學習者，在建築空間知覺能力後測上具顯著差異。 四、不同背景學歷之學習者，在建築空間知覺能力後測上具顯著差異。 五、不同教學分組，在建築設備學課程學習態度及建築技術實務能力具顯著差異，而且實驗組高於控制組。[[abstract]]The purpose of this study was to investigate the learning performance in different teaching methods and spatial perception abilities at the course of architectural facilities for the architectural students in the Technological College. To fulfill this purpose, the method of quasi experiment design was used. The instruments of this study consisted of architectural facility attitude scale, spatial perception ability scale of architecture, achievement pre-test and post-test of architectural facility, assessment check list of technically practical competence in architecture; and the teaching materials of problem-based learning. The subjects of teaching experiment were two classes of students who studied in the curriculum of architectural facilities, Department of Architecture, Chaoyang University of Technology, at 2003, first and second semester. The students of each class were randomly assigned into experimental group or control group. The validly samples of this study consisted 97 students, including 47 students in experimental group and 50 students in control group. The experimental group adopted teaching approach of problem-based learning. It is slightly modified from Maastricht University medical programme, 7-jump model. The control group adopted the lecture teaching method. The main procedures of statistical analysis included One-way MANCOVA and MANOVA. The main finding of this study were described briefly as follows: 1.There was significant difference in the performance of architectural facility among students from different means entered the school. 2.The students who had more long work experience were significantly higher technically practical competence in architecture. 3.There was significant difference in the spatial perception ability scale of architecture among students were different years of learning architecture. 4.There was significant difference in the spatial perception ability scale of architecture among students were different academic background. 5.There were significant between two groups differences in terms of architectural facility attitude and technically practical competence in architecture. The experimental group presented better than control group