Although the third and fourth chapters of the Book of Joshua most certainly communicate a record of Israel\u27s crossing of the Jordan, a close reading of this narrative surfaces certain peculiarities. Since the purpose of ensuing essay is to approach a plausible paradigm for understanding the message and intentions of the author of Joshua 3:1-4:24, this essay will begin with a brief discussion of a couple of the interpretive difficulties found in these chapters. Following are two specific interpretive problems that are representative of the overall difficulty that these chapters present to the reader
Problem. It has been suggested that the biblical account of the Israelite conquest of Canaan and the...
I set out to read the book of Joshua together with its most literal interpreters – those who enacted...
<strong>Reading the book of Joshua against a post-exilic background</strong><p>Thi...
Summary of the problem. The gamut of views concerning the conquest of Ai narrative in the 7th and 8t...
The narration and dialogue surrounding the ark of the covenant and its ‘amazing things’ testify to G...
Biblical research aimed at clarifying the hermeneutical complexities surrounding the book of Joshua ...
Some modern approaches conceive the Old Testament history as constitutional narratives for a nation ...
The differences between the MT and LXX texts of Joshua 24 are numerous and complex. In this essay, I...
Joshua 24 is generally assumed to be the concluding chapter of a Hexateuch. Several texts in Genesis...
While recent Old Testament scholarship has seen a steady rise in the prominence of narrative approac...
In this article, I identify a socio-historical context where conquest traditions were rewritten: nam...
Interpreters of the book of Jonah understand the characterisation of Jonah, and hence the meaning of...
Although the book of Joshua is often read as being hostile to non-Israelites, this paper argues that...
Intrinsic analysis of a Hebrew prose passage is not enough. As Tremper Longmann reminds us, “a liter...
A significant part of the Bible consists of stories. We are aware of this because we know what stori...
Problem. It has been suggested that the biblical account of the Israelite conquest of Canaan and the...
I set out to read the book of Joshua together with its most literal interpreters – those who enacted...
<strong>Reading the book of Joshua against a post-exilic background</strong><p>Thi...
Summary of the problem. The gamut of views concerning the conquest of Ai narrative in the 7th and 8t...
The narration and dialogue surrounding the ark of the covenant and its ‘amazing things’ testify to G...
Biblical research aimed at clarifying the hermeneutical complexities surrounding the book of Joshua ...
Some modern approaches conceive the Old Testament history as constitutional narratives for a nation ...
The differences between the MT and LXX texts of Joshua 24 are numerous and complex. In this essay, I...
Joshua 24 is generally assumed to be the concluding chapter of a Hexateuch. Several texts in Genesis...
While recent Old Testament scholarship has seen a steady rise in the prominence of narrative approac...
In this article, I identify a socio-historical context where conquest traditions were rewritten: nam...
Interpreters of the book of Jonah understand the characterisation of Jonah, and hence the meaning of...
Although the book of Joshua is often read as being hostile to non-Israelites, this paper argues that...
Intrinsic analysis of a Hebrew prose passage is not enough. As Tremper Longmann reminds us, “a liter...
A significant part of the Bible consists of stories. We are aware of this because we know what stori...
Problem. It has been suggested that the biblical account of the Israelite conquest of Canaan and the...
I set out to read the book of Joshua together with its most literal interpreters – those who enacted...
<strong>Reading the book of Joshua against a post-exilic background</strong><p>Thi...