<p>The left panel contains the raw predicted values and the right panel contains difference scores (reversal–control) for each level of accuracy. Error bars represent 95% (thin lines) and 50% (thick lines) HDIs.</p
<p>(A) The response (percent signal change relative to the fixation condition) in each ROI is shown ...
<p>Change in preference ratings for chosen and unchosen facial stimuli after a blind choice between ...
Negative judgement bias indicates a bias toward guessing “in” rather than “out”. (*) indicates stati...
<p>The left panel contains the raw predicted values and the right panel contains difference scores (...
<p>The left panel contains the raw predicted values and the right panel contains difference scores (...
<p>Change in preference ratings for chosen and rejected images of a landscape after blind choice bet...
<p>Dashed line represents the proportion of ratings expected by chance (i.e., 0.333), error bars rep...
(Note: a boxplot was not appropriate for data visualisation here due to the binary nature of ‘choice...
(A). Preference indices plotted as a function of image. Upper X-axis: scaling factor for eye size, l...
This paper investigates whether some part of the preference reversal phenomenon can be attributed to...
This paper investigates whether some part of the preference reversal phenomenon can be attributed to...
<p>Change in preference ratings for chosen and unchosen facial stimuli after blind choice between tw...
<p>Dashed line represents the proportion of ratings expected by chance (i.e., 0.333), error bars rep...
<p>Change in preference ratings for chosen and unchosen facial stimuli after a blind choice between ...
<p>Top panel: Probability of choice as a function of both position and rank in duration. a, b- Proba...
<p>(A) The response (percent signal change relative to the fixation condition) in each ROI is shown ...
<p>Change in preference ratings for chosen and unchosen facial stimuli after a blind choice between ...
Negative judgement bias indicates a bias toward guessing “in” rather than “out”. (*) indicates stati...
<p>The left panel contains the raw predicted values and the right panel contains difference scores (...
<p>The left panel contains the raw predicted values and the right panel contains difference scores (...
<p>Change in preference ratings for chosen and rejected images of a landscape after blind choice bet...
<p>Dashed line represents the proportion of ratings expected by chance (i.e., 0.333), error bars rep...
(Note: a boxplot was not appropriate for data visualisation here due to the binary nature of ‘choice...
(A). Preference indices plotted as a function of image. Upper X-axis: scaling factor for eye size, l...
This paper investigates whether some part of the preference reversal phenomenon can be attributed to...
This paper investigates whether some part of the preference reversal phenomenon can be attributed to...
<p>Change in preference ratings for chosen and unchosen facial stimuli after blind choice between tw...
<p>Dashed line represents the proportion of ratings expected by chance (i.e., 0.333), error bars rep...
<p>Change in preference ratings for chosen and unchosen facial stimuli after a blind choice between ...
<p>Top panel: Probability of choice as a function of both position and rank in duration. a, b- Proba...
<p>(A) The response (percent signal change relative to the fixation condition) in each ROI is shown ...
<p>Change in preference ratings for chosen and unchosen facial stimuli after a blind choice between ...
Negative judgement bias indicates a bias toward guessing “in” rather than “out”. (*) indicates stati...
DOI
Add to ORKG