Gender differences in intimate partner violence

目的：调查亲密伴侣暴力的发生率，比较暴力发生率的性别差异，分析影响亲密伴侣暴力发生的社会心理因素。方法：采取分层抽样的方法，在全国选取7个地区，运用自编人口学资料和中文修订版冲突策略量表简版（CTS-2s）量表，共调查2567名处于或曾经处于亲密伴侣中被试。结果：亲密伴侣暴力的总发生率为50．88％；男对女的暴力与女对男的暴力发生率相当，多数为互相施暴，但性强迫维度，男对女的暴力高于女对男。协商、年龄、婚姻满意度是亲密伴侣暴力的保护性因素；现居地、男性收入比重、儿子女儿数量、工作状况、家庭收入、经济压力、吸烟数量、男性精神疾病、男性父母暴力都与亲密伴侣发生有关。结论：亲密伴侣暴力的总发生率没有性别差异，且多数为互相施暴。亲密伴侣暴力的发生是各种心理社会因素综合作用的结果，年龄、协商、婚姻满意度是家庭暴力的保护性因素。Objectives:To study the incidence of intimate partner violence (IPV),compare the gender differences,analyze the social psychological factors which affect the happening of IPV.Methods:With the multi-stage stratified sampling,we randomly selected 2567 adults who were in or once in an intimate relationships,and in-vestigated them with a self-made demographic information questionnaire and the Chinese Version Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS-2s).Results:The total incidence of IPV was 50.88%;incidence of male violence against women was mostly equal to the female violence against male,with the majority being bidirectional IPV,but the sex forced di-mension of male against women was higher than female to male.Consultation,age and marital satisfaction were the protective factors of IPV,while risk factors were male income proportion,work status,family income,smoking quantity,male mental illness and so on.Conclusions:There is no gender difference in the total incidence of IPV, and mostly violence is bidirectional IPV.IPV is a result of combined action of various psychological social factors, and consultation,age and marital satisfaction are the protective factors of IPV.国家科技支撑计划(2009BAI77B05)。中国科技核心期刊(ISTIC)0996-9