Add to ORKG13 pagesInternational audienceThere has been a lively debate in many fields, including statistics and related applied fields such as psychology and biomedical research, on possible reforms of the scholarly publishing system. Currently, referees contribute so much to improve scientific papers, both directly through constructive criticism and indirectly through the threat of rejection. We discuss ways in which new approaches to journal publication could continue to make use of the valuable efforts of peer reviewers
The practice of peer review is to ensure the research published in Current Issues in Sport Science (...
Peer review of research articles is a core part of our scholarly communication system. In spite of i...
International audienceDriven by a constant process of specialization, the extension of judging insta...
13 pagesInternational audienceThere has been a lively debate in many fields, including statistics an...
Academic journals rely on researchers agreeing to act as reviewers (or referees) for submitted paper...
The idea for this symposium began when Sheryl Fontaine and Susan Hunter told Rick Gebhardt about two...
This paper looks at 10 years of reviews in a multidisciplinary journal, The Journal of Artificial So...
This chapter explains the functioning of scientific journals from the editorial side of the process....
The standard of a primary specialized journal depends to a large extent on the quality of the peer-r...
Quality peer reviewing is not only crucial for publications, but it is vital for the career developm...
<div><p>Peer review is the gold standard for scientific communication, but its ability to guarantee ...
Peer review of research articles is a core part of our scholarly communication system. In spite of i...
The peer-review crisis is posing a risk to the scholarly peer-reviewed journal system. Journals have...
Peer review is an important element of scientific communication but deserves quantitative examinatio...
There is little dispute that peer review will remain as a means of quality control and certification...
The practice of peer review is to ensure the research published in Current Issues in Sport Science (...
Peer review of research articles is a core part of our scholarly communication system. In spite of i...
International audienceDriven by a constant process of specialization, the extension of judging insta...
13 pagesInternational audienceThere has been a lively debate in many fields, including statistics an...
Academic journals rely on researchers agreeing to act as reviewers (or referees) for submitted paper...
The idea for this symposium began when Sheryl Fontaine and Susan Hunter told Rick Gebhardt about two...
This paper looks at 10 years of reviews in a multidisciplinary journal, The Journal of Artificial So...
This chapter explains the functioning of scientific journals from the editorial side of the process....
The standard of a primary specialized journal depends to a large extent on the quality of the peer-r...
Quality peer reviewing is not only crucial for publications, but it is vital for the career developm...
<div><p>Peer review is the gold standard for scientific communication, but its ability to guarantee ...
Peer review of research articles is a core part of our scholarly communication system. In spite of i...
The peer-review crisis is posing a risk to the scholarly peer-reviewed journal system. Journals have...
Peer review is an important element of scientific communication but deserves quantitative examinatio...
There is little dispute that peer review will remain as a means of quality control and certification...
The practice of peer review is to ensure the research published in Current Issues in Sport Science (...
Peer review of research articles is a core part of our scholarly communication system. In spite of i...
International audienceDriven by a constant process of specialization, the extension of judging insta...