Add to ORKGSpain’s withdrawal of the EAWs for Puigdemont and his ministers is narrowly linked to the uncertain outcome that would have followed their examination by the Belgian authorities
This paper looks at the consequences of the social and political process of the Europeanisation of j...
Through the implementation of a European arrest warrant (EAW), the Member states of the European Uni...
[Introduction]. The judgment in the case of Conka v. Belgium of 5 February 2002 by the European Cour...
The decision by the Oberlandesgericht of Schleswig in the Puigdemont case is a flawed ruling that s...
On March 23rd, the Irish High Court sent an unprecedented request for a preliminary ruling before th...
The recent Carles Puigdemont case confirms that European criminal law, in particular the European Ar...
In its judgment of the 19th of November 2013, Belgium’s highest court, the Court of Cassation, confi...
This bachelor’s work deals with issue of a framework decision on the European arrest warrant and th...
This paper reviews the extent to which the development of instruments that implement the principle o...
Even before the outcome of the case between Syrian asylum-seekers v. the Belgian state (X and X v. B...
The highly anticipated hearing in the Celmer case took place on 1 June 2018 before the Grand Chamber...
The highly anticipated hearing in the Celmer case took place on 1 June 2018 before the Grand Chamber...
12 September 2018 saw the European Parliament (EP) vote in favour of launching Article 7 TEU proceed...
The European Arrest Warrant (EAW) is the first and most important measure in the field of European c...
Apart from weak Council conclusions adopted last November and a non-binding resolution of the Europe...
This paper looks at the consequences of the social and political process of the Europeanisation of j...
Through the implementation of a European arrest warrant (EAW), the Member states of the European Uni...
[Introduction]. The judgment in the case of Conka v. Belgium of 5 February 2002 by the European Cour...
The decision by the Oberlandesgericht of Schleswig in the Puigdemont case is a flawed ruling that s...
On March 23rd, the Irish High Court sent an unprecedented request for a preliminary ruling before th...
The recent Carles Puigdemont case confirms that European criminal law, in particular the European Ar...
In its judgment of the 19th of November 2013, Belgium’s highest court, the Court of Cassation, confi...
This bachelor’s work deals with issue of a framework decision on the European arrest warrant and th...
This paper reviews the extent to which the development of instruments that implement the principle o...
Even before the outcome of the case between Syrian asylum-seekers v. the Belgian state (X and X v. B...
The highly anticipated hearing in the Celmer case took place on 1 June 2018 before the Grand Chamber...
The highly anticipated hearing in the Celmer case took place on 1 June 2018 before the Grand Chamber...
12 September 2018 saw the European Parliament (EP) vote in favour of launching Article 7 TEU proceed...
The European Arrest Warrant (EAW) is the first and most important measure in the field of European c...
Apart from weak Council conclusions adopted last November and a non-binding resolution of the Europe...
This paper looks at the consequences of the social and political process of the Europeanisation of j...
Through the implementation of a European arrest warrant (EAW), the Member states of the European Uni...
[Introduction]. The judgment in the case of Conka v. Belgium of 5 February 2002 by the European Cour...