Organizational ecology is commonly seen as a Darwinian research program that seeks to explain the diversity of organizational structures, properties and behaviors as the product of selection in past social environments in a similar manner as evolutionary biology seeks to explain the forms, properties and behaviors of organisms as consequences of selection in past natural environments. We argue that this explanatory strategy does not succeed because organizational ecology theory lacks an evolutionary mechanism that could be identified as the principal cause of organizational diversity. The "evolution" of organizational populations by means of selection, which organizational ecologists put forward as the mechanism responsible for the extant d...
Purpose \u2013 Recently, some biologists have argued that the time has come to replace separation be...
The fact of organisational diversity leads us to put forward the paradox of " dynamic fit ". This se...
Does evolutionary theory help, for a theory of the firm, or, more widely, a theory of organization? ...
Reydon and Scholz raise doubts about the Darwinian status of organizational ecology by arguing that ...
Recently, Dollimore criticized our claim that Organizational Ecology is not a Darwinian research pro...
The business of this paper is to examine whether organizations ‘evolve’. In every-day language, it i...
In an earlier article published in this journal I challenge Reydon and Scholz's (2009) claim that Or...
I argue that research methodologies in organizational studies provide an example of cultural evoluti...
In a recent article we argued that organizational ecology is not a Darwinian research program. John ...
The terms ‘evolution’ and ‘coevolution’ are widely used in organization studies but rarely defined. ...
How do social organizations evolve? How do they adapt to environmental pressures? What resources an...
Abstract How do social organizations evolve? How do they adapt to environmental pressures? What reso...
In a recent article in this journal, Geoffrey Hodgson points out that the notion of 'evolution' is w...
One area in which strategy and organizational ecology converge is organizational change. This essay ...
The population ecology paradigm gained acceptance in the organizational theory literature during the...
Purpose \u2013 Recently, some biologists have argued that the time has come to replace separation be...
The fact of organisational diversity leads us to put forward the paradox of " dynamic fit ". This se...
Does evolutionary theory help, for a theory of the firm, or, more widely, a theory of organization? ...
Reydon and Scholz raise doubts about the Darwinian status of organizational ecology by arguing that ...
Recently, Dollimore criticized our claim that Organizational Ecology is not a Darwinian research pro...
The business of this paper is to examine whether organizations ‘evolve’. In every-day language, it i...
In an earlier article published in this journal I challenge Reydon and Scholz's (2009) claim that Or...
I argue that research methodologies in organizational studies provide an example of cultural evoluti...
In a recent article we argued that organizational ecology is not a Darwinian research program. John ...
The terms ‘evolution’ and ‘coevolution’ are widely used in organization studies but rarely defined. ...
How do social organizations evolve? How do they adapt to environmental pressures? What resources an...
Abstract How do social organizations evolve? How do they adapt to environmental pressures? What reso...
In a recent article in this journal, Geoffrey Hodgson points out that the notion of 'evolution' is w...
One area in which strategy and organizational ecology converge is organizational change. This essay ...
The population ecology paradigm gained acceptance in the organizational theory literature during the...
Purpose \u2013 Recently, some biologists have argued that the time has come to replace separation be...
The fact of organisational diversity leads us to put forward the paradox of " dynamic fit ". This se...
Does evolutionary theory help, for a theory of the firm, or, more widely, a theory of organization? ...