AbstractWe examine the effect of endogenous and exogenous risk on the equilibrium (expected) membership of an International Environmental Agreement when countries are risk averse. Endogenous risk arises when countries use mixed rather than pure strategies at the participation game, and exogenous risk arises from the inherent uncertainty about the costs and benefits of increased abatement. Under endogenous risk, an increase in risk aversion increases expected participation. Under exogenous risk and pure strategies, increased risk aversion weakly decreases equilibrium participation if and only if the variance of income decreases with abatement
We extend a three-country game model of international environmental agreements (IEAs) by Na and Shin...
We study the impact of loss-aversion and the threat of catastrophic damages, which we jointly call t...
We examine the size of stable coalitions in a participation game that has been used to model interna...
We introduce uncertainty and risk aversion to the study of international environmental agreements. W...
This paper explores the implications of the possibility of a shift in environmental damages on the p...
Our analysis simultaneously deals with two types of uncertainty: first, the uncertainty of the behav...
The regulation of environmental externalities at the global level requires international agreements ...
We modify a canonical participation game used to study International Environmental Agreements (IEA),...
We modify a canonical participation game used to study International Environmental Agreements (IEA),...
In this paper we analyze how rati cation uncertainty impacts the optimal terms of international envi...
We analyse effects of distribution of countries' characteristics on stability of coalition and welfa...
We modify a canonical participation game used to study International Environmental Agreements (IEA),...
This study investigates the effectiveness of international environmental agreements (IEAs) and how ...
We study international environmental agreements in the presence of a potential climate catastrophe b...
Most theoretical work on the formation of IEAs has implicitly assumed that trade relationships betwe...
We extend a three-country game model of international environmental agreements (IEAs) by Na and Shin...
We study the impact of loss-aversion and the threat of catastrophic damages, which we jointly call t...
We examine the size of stable coalitions in a participation game that has been used to model interna...
We introduce uncertainty and risk aversion to the study of international environmental agreements. W...
This paper explores the implications of the possibility of a shift in environmental damages on the p...
Our analysis simultaneously deals with two types of uncertainty: first, the uncertainty of the behav...
The regulation of environmental externalities at the global level requires international agreements ...
We modify a canonical participation game used to study International Environmental Agreements (IEA),...
We modify a canonical participation game used to study International Environmental Agreements (IEA),...
In this paper we analyze how rati cation uncertainty impacts the optimal terms of international envi...
We analyse effects of distribution of countries' characteristics on stability of coalition and welfa...
We modify a canonical participation game used to study International Environmental Agreements (IEA),...
This study investigates the effectiveness of international environmental agreements (IEAs) and how ...
We study international environmental agreements in the presence of a potential climate catastrophe b...
Most theoretical work on the formation of IEAs has implicitly assumed that trade relationships betwe...
We extend a three-country game model of international environmental agreements (IEAs) by Na and Shin...
We study the impact of loss-aversion and the threat of catastrophic damages, which we jointly call t...
We examine the size of stable coalitions in a participation game that has been used to model interna...