Non-material damage: the regulation in the Italian legal order

V magistrskem dele Nepremoženjska škoda: ureditev v italijanskem pravnem redu analiziram ureditev povrnitve nepremoženjske škode v italijanskem pravu. Nepremoženjska škoda se lahko kaže v različnih oblikah, pri čemer je vprašljiva praktičnost različnega etiketiranja pojavnih oblik. V Italiji je dolgo časa obstajalo precej kaotično stanje, saj je obstajala nejasnost glede tega, kaj spada v kategorije t.i. biološke škode, moralne škode, eksistenčne škode in tanatološke škode. Vsaka od navedenih kategoriji ima za seboj zanimivo zgodbo. Italijanski Civilni zakonik ureja povrnitev nepremoženjske škode zelo na splošno, zato so iz potreb sodne prakse nastale različne tabele za določanje višine odškodnine za nepremoženjsko škodo. De facto se najbolj uporabljajo tabele sodišča v Milanu, ustvarjene z namenom poenotenja obravnave in določanja višine denarne odškodnine, ki ob primerni individualizaciji odškodnine vnašajo stabilnost v pravni red.Master thesis Non-material damage: the regulation in the Italian legal order is intended to analyse legal institutes of compensatory law as they are known in Italy. Damages can be manifested in a wide variety of forms. The practicality of labeling each and every form of it is questionable. Over the last few decades there has been a chaos among Italian jurists, since they didn\u27t know exactly what belongs to the so-called category of biological damage, moral damage, existential damega, tanatological damage. Each of those categories has in interesting story behind, many of them with a questionable law substrat, but each with its own genesis and method of use. The Italian Civil Code provides a few general rules on the compensation of damage. Various tables used for the award of compensation for non-pecuniary damage have arisen from the lack of more explicit regulation. In fact, the most used and applicable table is one of the Milano\u27s court, created to unify the treatment and determine the level of monetary compensation, which, with an appropriate individualisation of the compensation, brings stability into the legal system