Why do law professors continue to produce scholarship even after achieving tenure? This essay, presented as part of a AALS panel discussing “Why We Write?”, considers some common and less common responses, and suggests that for at least a few professors, legal scholarship can serve as a way of resisting the overbearing dominance of the “scientific” worldview evident in so much modern thought in favor of a perspective more attentive to the value of persons
This wonderful collection of reviews of leading recent books about law provides the occasion to ask ...
This article seeks to find a definition of “scholarship.” Scholarship, to be fully recognized in the...
Most authors of legal scholarship would probably hesitate to describe their writings as heroic tales...
Why do law professors continue to produce scholarship even after achieving tenure? This essay, prese...
Why do law professors continue to produce scholarship even after achieving tenure? This essay, prese...
What is the purpose of legal scholarship? The foreword to the University of Michigan Law Review\u27s...
This article explores the many institutionalized obstacles placed in the paths of the legal academy\...
In this essay, I argue that law schools should continue to encourage and support wide-ranging legal ...
Academic critics contend that legal scholarship is overly argumentative or too “normative,” simply s...
Law professors occupy a twin role as scholars and (most of them, at any rate) as lawyers. Deborah Rh...
Perhaps because the field of legal writing has now matured enough so that we professors constitute a...
It is hard to turn around nowadays without hearing about the malaise in legal scholarship. For examp...
Legal scholarship, under attack from critics both inside and outside the legal academy, is on the ho...
A general debate concerning whether law blogs can be legal scholarship makes little more sense than ...
In the Articles that follow, a group of extraordinarily successful legal scholars set out their thou...
This wonderful collection of reviews of leading recent books about law provides the occasion to ask ...
This article seeks to find a definition of “scholarship.” Scholarship, to be fully recognized in the...
Most authors of legal scholarship would probably hesitate to describe their writings as heroic tales...
Why do law professors continue to produce scholarship even after achieving tenure? This essay, prese...
Why do law professors continue to produce scholarship even after achieving tenure? This essay, prese...
What is the purpose of legal scholarship? The foreword to the University of Michigan Law Review\u27s...
This article explores the many institutionalized obstacles placed in the paths of the legal academy\...
In this essay, I argue that law schools should continue to encourage and support wide-ranging legal ...
Academic critics contend that legal scholarship is overly argumentative or too “normative,” simply s...
Law professors occupy a twin role as scholars and (most of them, at any rate) as lawyers. Deborah Rh...
Perhaps because the field of legal writing has now matured enough so that we professors constitute a...
It is hard to turn around nowadays without hearing about the malaise in legal scholarship. For examp...
Legal scholarship, under attack from critics both inside and outside the legal academy, is on the ho...
A general debate concerning whether law blogs can be legal scholarship makes little more sense than ...
In the Articles that follow, a group of extraordinarily successful legal scholars set out their thou...
This wonderful collection of reviews of leading recent books about law provides the occasion to ask ...
This article seeks to find a definition of “scholarship.” Scholarship, to be fully recognized in the...
Most authors of legal scholarship would probably hesitate to describe their writings as heroic tales...