Add to ORKGabstract: After surveying the literature on the normativity of logic, the paper answers that logic is normative for reasoning and rationality. The paper then goes on to discuss whether this constitutes a new problem in issues in normativity, and the paper affirms that it does. Finally, the paper concludes by explaining that the logic as model view can address this new problem.Dissertation/ThesisMasters Thesis Philosophy 201
In this paper, it is examined how, if at all, the logical laws can be normative for human reasoning,...
(1) This paper is about how to build an account of the normativity of logic around the claim that lo...
Logical pluralism is the view that there is more than one correct logic. Most logical pluralists thi...
Physical laws are irresistible. Logical rules are not. That is why logic is said to be normative. Gi...
In my thesis, I address the question ʽWhat normative status does logic have?', to argue that logical...
According to tradition, logic is normative for reasoning. Gilbert Harman challenged the view that th...
ABSTRACT. Physical laws are irresistible. Logical rules are not. That is why logic is said to be nor...
This paper explores an apparent tension between two widely held views about logic: that logic is nor...
Some writers object to logical pluralism on the grounds that logic is normative. The rough idea is t...
Logic, the tradition has it, is normative for reasoning. But is that really so? And if so, in what s...
The paper argues that much of the difficulty with making progress on the issue of the normativity of...
Logic appears to be normative for rational belief. The thesis of the normativity of logic holds tha...
This paper advocates for the normative role of logic in reasoning. I offer a response, anchored in a...
Logic and reasoning appear to be closely connected. What the exact relationship is might be contenti...
According to tradition, logic is normative for reasoning. According to many contemporary philosopher...
In this paper, it is examined how, if at all, the logical laws can be normative for human reasoning,...
(1) This paper is about how to build an account of the normativity of logic around the claim that lo...
Logical pluralism is the view that there is more than one correct logic. Most logical pluralists thi...
Physical laws are irresistible. Logical rules are not. That is why logic is said to be normative. Gi...
In my thesis, I address the question ʽWhat normative status does logic have?', to argue that logical...
According to tradition, logic is normative for reasoning. Gilbert Harman challenged the view that th...
ABSTRACT. Physical laws are irresistible. Logical rules are not. That is why logic is said to be nor...
This paper explores an apparent tension between two widely held views about logic: that logic is nor...
Some writers object to logical pluralism on the grounds that logic is normative. The rough idea is t...
Logic, the tradition has it, is normative for reasoning. But is that really so? And if so, in what s...
The paper argues that much of the difficulty with making progress on the issue of the normativity of...
Logic appears to be normative for rational belief. The thesis of the normativity of logic holds tha...
This paper advocates for the normative role of logic in reasoning. I offer a response, anchored in a...
Logic and reasoning appear to be closely connected. What the exact relationship is might be contenti...
According to tradition, logic is normative for reasoning. According to many contemporary philosopher...
In this paper, it is examined how, if at all, the logical laws can be normative for human reasoning,...
(1) This paper is about how to build an account of the normativity of logic around the claim that lo...
Logical pluralism is the view that there is more than one correct logic. Most logical pluralists thi...