Figure S1. Using R package “ConsensusClusterPlus” to cluster GEO data and the cumulative distribution function (CDF) reaches a maximum when k = 3, thus consensus and cluster confidence is at a maximum. (PDF 1485 kb
Figure S1. Evaluation of consensus clustering of the breast cancer dataset from k = 2 to k = 10. (A)...
Additional file 1: Supplementary Figure 1. Kaplan-Meiercurves of OS differences stratified by age, g...
Table S5. Cox’s proportional hazard regression analysis for progress free survival (PFS) in 87 M0 cc...
Figure S3. Clustering dendrograms of genes, with dissimilarity based on topological overlap, togethe...
Figure S4. Coefficient between modules and clinical parameters. Pvalue is below coefficient value. (...
Figure S5. Weighted Gene Co-expression Network plot of blue module. Red color means hub gene and the...
Figure S3. Survival analysis based on Risk Score at diagnosis. Kaplan-Meier cancer specific survival...
Figure S2. Copy number variation (CNV) analysis. CNV analysis of twelve chromosome regions previousl...
Figure S1. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis. SNP analysis of 65 genotyping probes on th...
Abstract Background Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) account for over 80% of renal malignancies. The most ...
Additional file 1: Table S1. Basic information of sample cohort. Table S2. Data quality control metr...
Supplementary figure 1. extracted significant prognosis-associated CRs using the Kaplan–Meier metho...
Table S4. Cox’s proportional hazard regression analysis for cancer specific survival (CSS) in 115 cc...
Figure S4. Distribution of hyper- and hypomethylated CpGs in patients with or without specific genom...
Heatmaps of patient similarity for kidney cancer. The similarity scores were measured by the Pearson...
Figure S1. Evaluation of consensus clustering of the breast cancer dataset from k = 2 to k = 10. (A)...
Additional file 1: Supplementary Figure 1. Kaplan-Meiercurves of OS differences stratified by age, g...
Table S5. Cox’s proportional hazard regression analysis for progress free survival (PFS) in 87 M0 cc...
Figure S3. Clustering dendrograms of genes, with dissimilarity based on topological overlap, togethe...
Figure S4. Coefficient between modules and clinical parameters. Pvalue is below coefficient value. (...
Figure S5. Weighted Gene Co-expression Network plot of blue module. Red color means hub gene and the...
Figure S3. Survival analysis based on Risk Score at diagnosis. Kaplan-Meier cancer specific survival...
Figure S2. Copy number variation (CNV) analysis. CNV analysis of twelve chromosome regions previousl...
Figure S1. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis. SNP analysis of 65 genotyping probes on th...
Abstract Background Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) account for over 80% of renal malignancies. The most ...
Additional file 1: Table S1. Basic information of sample cohort. Table S2. Data quality control metr...
Supplementary figure 1. extracted significant prognosis-associated CRs using the Kaplan–Meier metho...
Table S4. Cox’s proportional hazard regression analysis for cancer specific survival (CSS) in 115 cc...
Figure S4. Distribution of hyper- and hypomethylated CpGs in patients with or without specific genom...
Heatmaps of patient similarity for kidney cancer. The similarity scores were measured by the Pearson...
Figure S1. Evaluation of consensus clustering of the breast cancer dataset from k = 2 to k = 10. (A)...
Additional file 1: Supplementary Figure 1. Kaplan-Meiercurves of OS differences stratified by age, g...
Table S5. Cox’s proportional hazard regression analysis for progress free survival (PFS) in 87 M0 cc...