<p>Each graph shows respondent selection for most cited (left axis, blue) and actual citations as of 2013 (right axis) for each paper. The top panel shows selections from all respondent subdisciplines. The middle panel shows selections where the respondent subdiscipline matches the article subdiscipline. The bottom panel shows selections where the respondent subdiscipline does not match the article subdiscipline.</p
Fractional counting of citations can improve on ranking of multidisciplinary research units (such as...
Three categories, overall KQI top 3, high KQI low citation, and computer science field, each contain...
<p>—from first to last in the direction of the arrows. The ranking derives from the averages of the ...
<p>The top panel shows the composite selections of our respondents for the question asking which pap...
<p>This graph is composed of four RCTs connected to 17 reviews by a total of 38 citations. Each vert...
<p>The red lines refer to the cited references in all papers published in 2003; the other lines refe...
<p>This graph is composed of four RCTs connected to 17 citing reviews by a total of 46 citations. Ea...
<p>Cells of subdiscipline pairs below the threshold of 30 co-citing papers and citation rates close ...
<p>The top panel shows the global results for all papers relevant to the respective question (either...
<p>Right: histogram of citation counts for a given member of the National Academy of Sciences across...
<p>Graph demonstrating the time period of publication of the 100 most cited systematic reviews and m...
<p><b>The rank-citation profiles for individual researchers (upper panels) and research teams (lower...
<p>Probability density function of the proportion of papers belonging to a particular subject-catego...
<p>This graph shows the contribution scores of top 45 features on the iLoc8897 dataset.</p
<p>Number of papers and relative citation rates of papers that cite between 1 and 55 subdisciplines....
Fractional counting of citations can improve on ranking of multidisciplinary research units (such as...
Three categories, overall KQI top 3, high KQI low citation, and computer science field, each contain...
<p>—from first to last in the direction of the arrows. The ranking derives from the averages of the ...
<p>The top panel shows the composite selections of our respondents for the question asking which pap...
<p>This graph is composed of four RCTs connected to 17 reviews by a total of 38 citations. Each vert...
<p>The red lines refer to the cited references in all papers published in 2003; the other lines refe...
<p>This graph is composed of four RCTs connected to 17 citing reviews by a total of 46 citations. Ea...
<p>Cells of subdiscipline pairs below the threshold of 30 co-citing papers and citation rates close ...
<p>The top panel shows the global results for all papers relevant to the respective question (either...
<p>Right: histogram of citation counts for a given member of the National Academy of Sciences across...
<p>Graph demonstrating the time period of publication of the 100 most cited systematic reviews and m...
<p><b>The rank-citation profiles for individual researchers (upper panels) and research teams (lower...
<p>Probability density function of the proportion of papers belonging to a particular subject-catego...
<p>This graph shows the contribution scores of top 45 features on the iLoc8897 dataset.</p
<p>Number of papers and relative citation rates of papers that cite between 1 and 55 subdisciplines....
Fractional counting of citations can improve on ranking of multidisciplinary research units (such as...
Three categories, overall KQI top 3, high KQI low citation, and computer science field, each contain...
<p>—from first to last in the direction of the arrows. The ranking derives from the averages of the ...