Add to ORKGThe Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution enumerates a cluster of rights granted to criminal defendants and is designed to make criminal prosecutions more accurate, fair, and legitimate. The Confrontation Clause, which states that „In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right…to be confronted with the witness against him” should not be underestimated. This article seeks to analyse the evolution of the Confrontation Clause and the extent of a defendant’s right to face-to-face confrontation. The article analyse the case Crawford v. Washington, which was a key shift in the Supreme Court’s Confrontation Clause jurisprudence
The Supreme Court’s decision in Ohio v. Clark, provides an occasion to take stock of the Sixth Amend...
For seventeen years, the Supreme Court’s Confrontation Clause jurisprudence has been confused and co...
The following edit excerpt, drawn from The Confrontation Clause Re-Rooted and Transformed, 2003-04...
For several centuries, prosecution witnesses in criminal cases have given their testimony under oath...
The Sixth Amendment to the Constitution guarantees the accused in a criminal prosecution the right ...
The Sixth Amendment\u27s Confrontation Clause grants criminal defendants the right to be confronted...
Article published in the Michigan State University School of Law Student Scholarship Collection
One of the most notable developments in contemporary constitutional law is the breakdown of jurispru...
In the United States, the right to confrontation is the hallmark fair trial protection. Most foreign...
In Crawford v. Washington, 124 S. Ct. 1354 (2004), the U.S. Supreme Court radically transformed its ...
The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2004 Crawford v. Washington decision drastically altered the long-standing ...
Crawford v. Washington radically transformed the doctrine governing the Confrontation Clause of the ...
This piece comments on the state of the Supreme Court’s Confrontation Clause jurisprudence at the cl...
This Article challenges the oft-cited but unpersuasive rule that the Sixth Amendment Confrontation C...
Despite the simplicity and apparent straightforward language of the confrontation clause in the Unit...
The Supreme Court’s decision in Ohio v. Clark, provides an occasion to take stock of the Sixth Amend...
For seventeen years, the Supreme Court’s Confrontation Clause jurisprudence has been confused and co...
The following edit excerpt, drawn from The Confrontation Clause Re-Rooted and Transformed, 2003-04...
For several centuries, prosecution witnesses in criminal cases have given their testimony under oath...
The Sixth Amendment to the Constitution guarantees the accused in a criminal prosecution the right ...
The Sixth Amendment\u27s Confrontation Clause grants criminal defendants the right to be confronted...
Article published in the Michigan State University School of Law Student Scholarship Collection
One of the most notable developments in contemporary constitutional law is the breakdown of jurispru...
In the United States, the right to confrontation is the hallmark fair trial protection. Most foreign...
In Crawford v. Washington, 124 S. Ct. 1354 (2004), the U.S. Supreme Court radically transformed its ...
The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2004 Crawford v. Washington decision drastically altered the long-standing ...
Crawford v. Washington radically transformed the doctrine governing the Confrontation Clause of the ...
This piece comments on the state of the Supreme Court’s Confrontation Clause jurisprudence at the cl...
This Article challenges the oft-cited but unpersuasive rule that the Sixth Amendment Confrontation C...
Despite the simplicity and apparent straightforward language of the confrontation clause in the Unit...
The Supreme Court’s decision in Ohio v. Clark, provides an occasion to take stock of the Sixth Amend...
For seventeen years, the Supreme Court’s Confrontation Clause jurisprudence has been confused and co...
The following edit excerpt, drawn from The Confrontation Clause Re-Rooted and Transformed, 2003-04...