The paper contains the replies to the comments made by Alan Millar, Yuval Avnur, Giorgio Volpe, and Maria Baghramian on my Extended Rationality: A Hinge Epistemology. It addresses, in particular, the nature of perceptual justification, the truth of hinges, my response to Humean skepticism and the issue of epistemic relativism
This is a critical commentary on Pritchard's book Epistemic Angst. In Section 2, I present the closu...
Hinge epistemology is sometimes taken to be exempt from many of the issues bedevilling regular epist...
A study of how hinge epistemology is compatible with the possibility of disagreement about hinges
The paper contains the replies to the comments made by Alan Millar, Yuval Avnur, Giorgio Volpe, and ...
In this paper, I respond to criticisms raised to my version of hinge epistemology in three contribut...
The book proposes a novel account of perceptual justification, indebted to Wittgenstein's idea that ...
The paper presents the main theses of my monograph Extended Rationality. A Hinge Epistemolog
The paper presents various kinds of "hinge epistemology"--that is, a theory of justification and kno...
Hinge epistemology has to dispel the worry that disagreeing over hinges is rationally inert. Buildin...
This paper is devoted to the role hinge propositions play or should play in epistemology and meta-ph...
In Extended Rationality (2015), Annalisa Coliva provides an important contribution to a family of po...
I here respond to four SERRC commentators on my paper ‘Perspectivism, Deontologism and Epistemic Pov...
In this paper, I outline an account of the structure of perceptual justification that develops Witt...
This paper explores the application of hinge epistemology to deep disagreement. Hinge epistemology h...
This introduction gives a summary of the content of the special issue Hinge Epistemology, grouping t...
This is a critical commentary on Pritchard's book Epistemic Angst. In Section 2, I present the closu...
Hinge epistemology is sometimes taken to be exempt from many of the issues bedevilling regular epist...
A study of how hinge epistemology is compatible with the possibility of disagreement about hinges
The paper contains the replies to the comments made by Alan Millar, Yuval Avnur, Giorgio Volpe, and ...
In this paper, I respond to criticisms raised to my version of hinge epistemology in three contribut...
The book proposes a novel account of perceptual justification, indebted to Wittgenstein's idea that ...
The paper presents the main theses of my monograph Extended Rationality. A Hinge Epistemolog
The paper presents various kinds of "hinge epistemology"--that is, a theory of justification and kno...
Hinge epistemology has to dispel the worry that disagreeing over hinges is rationally inert. Buildin...
This paper is devoted to the role hinge propositions play or should play in epistemology and meta-ph...
In Extended Rationality (2015), Annalisa Coliva provides an important contribution to a family of po...
I here respond to four SERRC commentators on my paper ‘Perspectivism, Deontologism and Epistemic Pov...
In this paper, I outline an account of the structure of perceptual justification that develops Witt...
This paper explores the application of hinge epistemology to deep disagreement. Hinge epistemology h...
This introduction gives a summary of the content of the special issue Hinge Epistemology, grouping t...
This is a critical commentary on Pritchard's book Epistemic Angst. In Section 2, I present the closu...
Hinge epistemology is sometimes taken to be exempt from many of the issues bedevilling regular epist...
A study of how hinge epistemology is compatible with the possibility of disagreement about hinges
DOI
Add to ORKG