In 2013, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) was called to decide the Povse case, where the Bosphorus presumption was confronted with the principle of mutual trust and automatic recognition of judgments. These principles are a cornerstone of the EU policy of judicial cooperation in civil matters and are a decisive instrument to the construction of the area of freedom, security and justice. In 2016, in the Avotiņš case, again the ECtHR faced the application of the Bosphorus presumption and the mechanism of automatic recognition of decisions, and sounded a serious warning. The objective of this study is to analyze these decisions of the ECtHR and their possible future influence over the principle of mutual trust, namely the compatibili...
This paper scrutinizes the multi-faceted implementation of mutual trust and recognition in the EU’...
The intersections between recognition and enforcement of foreign decisions in civil and commercial m...
It is widely accepted that evolutive interpretation is necessary to keep European human rights effec...
In the Avotiņš v. Latvia judgment the European Court of Human Rights (ECrtHR) rules on the compatibi...
In the area of freedom, security and justice, mutual trust is closely related to mutual recognition....
The Bosphorus presumption was formed and explicitly applied for the first time in 2005 by the Europe...
The Court of Justice of the European Union(the CJEU)delivered Court Opinion 2/13 according to which ...
The principle of mutual trust is not mentioned in the Treaties, but nonetheless, it has be-come a st...
The principle of mutual trust has been a central pillar of the European integration project, first a...
This chapter takes a closer look at the productive partnership between the Court of Justice of the E...
Protecting fundamental rights within the EU’s compound legal order should be understood in the conte...
The judgment in Avotin � vs. Latvia is particularly important. It is the first time since the ECJ Op...
Several academics, this author included, have criticized the CJEU when dealing with the question of ...
The landmark judgment in the case of Bivolaru and Moldovan v. France, which concerned the execution ...
The landmark judgment in the case of Bivolaru and Moldovan v. France, which concerned the execution ...
This paper scrutinizes the multi-faceted implementation of mutual trust and recognition in the EU’...
The intersections between recognition and enforcement of foreign decisions in civil and commercial m...
It is widely accepted that evolutive interpretation is necessary to keep European human rights effec...
In the Avotiņš v. Latvia judgment the European Court of Human Rights (ECrtHR) rules on the compatibi...
In the area of freedom, security and justice, mutual trust is closely related to mutual recognition....
The Bosphorus presumption was formed and explicitly applied for the first time in 2005 by the Europe...
The Court of Justice of the European Union(the CJEU)delivered Court Opinion 2/13 according to which ...
The principle of mutual trust is not mentioned in the Treaties, but nonetheless, it has be-come a st...
The principle of mutual trust has been a central pillar of the European integration project, first a...
This chapter takes a closer look at the productive partnership between the Court of Justice of the E...
Protecting fundamental rights within the EU’s compound legal order should be understood in the conte...
The judgment in Avotin � vs. Latvia is particularly important. It is the first time since the ECJ Op...
Several academics, this author included, have criticized the CJEU when dealing with the question of ...
The landmark judgment in the case of Bivolaru and Moldovan v. France, which concerned the execution ...
The landmark judgment in the case of Bivolaru and Moldovan v. France, which concerned the execution ...
This paper scrutinizes the multi-faceted implementation of mutual trust and recognition in the EU’...
The intersections between recognition and enforcement of foreign decisions in civil and commercial m...
It is widely accepted that evolutive interpretation is necessary to keep European human rights effec...