This paper argues that the structural obscurity in Kant’s Critique of the Power of Judgment reflects his tacit employment of three correlated but distinct notions: necessity considered as the universal validity of the judgment of taste; necessity considered as a feature of the judgment itself; and necessity considered as a feature of the mental free harmony that obtains in judging certain forms with taste. These distinctions have not been sufficiently recognized by commentators so far. Clarification of these three notions can shed new light on the structure of the first part of Kant’s third Critique as well as on debates over the plausibility of his claims regarding taste.status: accepte
In the Critique of Judgment, Kant argues that judgment, our faculty for thinking particulars under u...
This article defends Kant’s aesthetics, drawn mainly from the Critique of Judgment. The author discu...
n the Critique of the Power of Judgment, Kant develops a rigorous formulation of aesthetic judgments...
This paper argues that the structural obscurity in Kant’s Critique of the Power of Judgment reflects...
In the Critique of the Power of Judgment, Immanuel Kant argues that when we form a judgmen...
Why did Kant write the Critique of Judgment, and why did he say that his analysis of the judgment of...
Why did Kant write the Critique of Judgment, and why did he say that his analysis of the judgment of...
I defend an understanding of Kant\u27s theory of Geschmacksurteil as detailing an operation of the f...
In this paper, it is argued that only in the section on dialectic in the Critique of Judgment does K...
It is sometimes assumed that Kant’s claim that a judgement of taste is grounded in a pleasure ‘witho...
Necessity can be ascribed not only to propositions, but also to feelings. In the Critique ...
It may be that Kant’s inherently communal concept of taste is a morally laden notion that blurs the ...
In this paper I defend two closely related claims. The first claim, to which the first section of t...
The article follows Kant’s different views on aesthetics ranging from the pre-critical period to the...
A universalidade do juízo de gosto não tem um princípio objetivo porque não pretende determinar nenh...
In the Critique of Judgment, Kant argues that judgment, our faculty for thinking particulars under u...
This article defends Kant’s aesthetics, drawn mainly from the Critique of Judgment. The author discu...
n the Critique of the Power of Judgment, Kant develops a rigorous formulation of aesthetic judgments...
This paper argues that the structural obscurity in Kant’s Critique of the Power of Judgment reflects...
In the Critique of the Power of Judgment, Immanuel Kant argues that when we form a judgmen...
Why did Kant write the Critique of Judgment, and why did he say that his analysis of the judgment of...
Why did Kant write the Critique of Judgment, and why did he say that his analysis of the judgment of...
I defend an understanding of Kant\u27s theory of Geschmacksurteil as detailing an operation of the f...
In this paper, it is argued that only in the section on dialectic in the Critique of Judgment does K...
It is sometimes assumed that Kant’s claim that a judgement of taste is grounded in a pleasure ‘witho...
Necessity can be ascribed not only to propositions, but also to feelings. In the Critique ...
It may be that Kant’s inherently communal concept of taste is a morally laden notion that blurs the ...
In this paper I defend two closely related claims. The first claim, to which the first section of t...
The article follows Kant’s different views on aesthetics ranging from the pre-critical period to the...
A universalidade do juízo de gosto não tem um princípio objetivo porque não pretende determinar nenh...
In the Critique of Judgment, Kant argues that judgment, our faculty for thinking particulars under u...
This article defends Kant’s aesthetics, drawn mainly from the Critique of Judgment. The author discu...
n the Critique of the Power of Judgment, Kant develops a rigorous formulation of aesthetic judgments...