Add to ORKGStudies indicate that humanitarian demining under civilian oversight is safer and more cost-efficient than humanitarian demining under military oversight. This article provides examples supporting such evidence, cites possible exceptions, and explores reasons for performance inadequacies in military demining units
The United States (U.S.) Department of Defense (DoD) Humanitarian Demining Programme has four explic...
The Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining’s mission is to serve as a leading center ...
I have approached this subject by studying the risks that deminers really face and the injuries that...
This article is drawn from a study conducted by the Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Dem...
For many years, a large debate over the use of military experts in humanitarian demining has existed...
The U.S. Humanitarian Demining Research and Development (R&D) Program rapidly develops, evaluates an...
Using three specific examples—Mozambique, Eritrea and Iraq—the author shows clearly how demining and...
Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and commercial companies are well-known in the mine action com...
Humanitarian mine action (HMA) is a field known for its paradigm shifts. Just as technological advan...
When assessing protection needs, my approach has been to determine what the risks are, what injuries...
This article examines the multiple partnerships that were formed during the planning and training de...
The Department of Defense (DoD) Humanitarian Demining program would like to thank the staff at James...
Clearing mines is expensive, and demining programs usually consume funding before reaching the task ...
In 1994, the United States initiated a research and development (R&D) program to develop new, intern...
Deminers and other humanitarian-aid workers around the world, though previously viewed as off-limits...
The United States (U.S.) Department of Defense (DoD) Humanitarian Demining Programme has four explic...
The Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining’s mission is to serve as a leading center ...
I have approached this subject by studying the risks that deminers really face and the injuries that...
This article is drawn from a study conducted by the Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Dem...
For many years, a large debate over the use of military experts in humanitarian demining has existed...
The U.S. Humanitarian Demining Research and Development (R&D) Program rapidly develops, evaluates an...
Using three specific examples—Mozambique, Eritrea and Iraq—the author shows clearly how demining and...
Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and commercial companies are well-known in the mine action com...
Humanitarian mine action (HMA) is a field known for its paradigm shifts. Just as technological advan...
When assessing protection needs, my approach has been to determine what the risks are, what injuries...
This article examines the multiple partnerships that were formed during the planning and training de...
The Department of Defense (DoD) Humanitarian Demining program would like to thank the staff at James...
Clearing mines is expensive, and demining programs usually consume funding before reaching the task ...
In 1994, the United States initiated a research and development (R&D) program to develop new, intern...
Deminers and other humanitarian-aid workers around the world, though previously viewed as off-limits...
The United States (U.S.) Department of Defense (DoD) Humanitarian Demining Programme has four explic...
The Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining’s mission is to serve as a leading center ...
I have approached this subject by studying the risks that deminers really face and the injuries that...