Add to ORKGAn expert ranking of forestry journals was compared with Journal Impact Factors and h-indices computed from the ISI Web of Science and internet-based data. Citations reported by Google Scholar offer an efficient way to rank all journals objectively, in a manner consistent with other indicators. This h-index exhibited a high correlation with the Journal Impact Factor (r = 0.92), but is not confined to journals selected by any particular commercial provider. A ranking of 180 forestry journals is presented, on the basis of this index
In recent years, there has been a significant increase in interest in publishing articles in journal...
<div><p>There are now many methods available to assess the relative citation performance of peer-rev...
What is the value of a scientist and its impact upon the scientific thinking? How can we measure the...
The increasing number of scientific journals, especially over the last 20 years, created the need fo...
Many stakeholders, including authors, editors, librarians and funding agencies, have an interest in ...
In this work we develop new journal classification methods based on the h-index. The introduction of...
Indexes in scientometrics are based on citations. However, in contrast to the journal impact factor,...
The ability to design an instrument sufficiently versatile to effectively gauge the impact of a scie...
We used the Journal Impact Factor (JIF) to develop the hjif-index, calculated in a similar way to h-...
We apply five majority-rule-based ordinal ranking methods to data on economic, management and politi...
Since the launch of Google Scholar Metrics (April 2012), the number of journals that include this bi...
International audienceObjective: Journal Impact Factor (IF) is well known for being the document mea...
textabstractExperts possess knowledge and information that are not publicly available. The paper is ...
This paper proposes using a new metric, h, and new data, drawn from Google Scholar, for ranking soci...
One of the main objectives of the International Union of Forest Research Organization%s WP 9.01.06 (...
In recent years, there has been a significant increase in interest in publishing articles in journal...
<div><p>There are now many methods available to assess the relative citation performance of peer-rev...
What is the value of a scientist and its impact upon the scientific thinking? How can we measure the...
The increasing number of scientific journals, especially over the last 20 years, created the need fo...
Many stakeholders, including authors, editors, librarians and funding agencies, have an interest in ...
In this work we develop new journal classification methods based on the h-index. The introduction of...
Indexes in scientometrics are based on citations. However, in contrast to the journal impact factor,...
The ability to design an instrument sufficiently versatile to effectively gauge the impact of a scie...
We used the Journal Impact Factor (JIF) to develop the hjif-index, calculated in a similar way to h-...
We apply five majority-rule-based ordinal ranking methods to data on economic, management and politi...
Since the launch of Google Scholar Metrics (April 2012), the number of journals that include this bi...
International audienceObjective: Journal Impact Factor (IF) is well known for being the document mea...
textabstractExperts possess knowledge and information that are not publicly available. The paper is ...
This paper proposes using a new metric, h, and new data, drawn from Google Scholar, for ranking soci...
One of the main objectives of the International Union of Forest Research Organization%s WP 9.01.06 (...
In recent years, there has been a significant increase in interest in publishing articles in journal...
<div><p>There are now many methods available to assess the relative citation performance of peer-rev...
What is the value of a scientist and its impact upon the scientific thinking? How can we measure the...