<p>Vertical bars represent within-subject SEM. <b>A.</b> Top figure shows d′ values significantly decreased for the nonpreferred time-order trials, as it did for the explicit factors of task difficulty and noise. <b>B.</b> Lower figure shows significantly longer response times for nonpreferred time-order trials. There were no significant differences in response time across task difficulty and noise levels.</p
<p><b>a.</b> Accuracy (% correct) as a function of reaction time for different coherence ranges, fro...
<p><b>A</b>, The standard task. Subjects viewed a horizontal bar (<i>L</i><sub>1</sub>) on a compute...
<p>A) Variability of response times for both probe blocks. Errorbars show standard error across subj...
<p>Vertical bars represent within-subject SEM. <b>A.</b> Top figure shows d′ values significantly de...
<p>Vertical bars represent within-subject SEM. <b>A.</b> Top figure shows d′ values significantly de...
<p>Bars show grand average behavioural accuracy as percentage correct (A) and grand average response...
<p>(<b>a</b>) Accuracy was lower in trials with novel sounds in comparison to those with standard so...
<p>D-prime (d′) was used to assess accuracy and response time (RT) was used to assess speed.</p
The speed–accuracy trade-off (SAT) suggests that time constraints reduce response accuracy. Its rele...
*<p>See <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0050425#s2" target="_b...
<p><b>A</b>, Subjects performed a modified experiment where a secondary task had to be performed bet...
<p>Proportion correct (PC) was used to assess accuracy and response time (RT) was used to assess spe...
<p>Subjects responded faster (lower median response times) and more consistently (lower mean within-...
In two experiments, we used response signals (RSs) to control processing time and trace out speed ac...
Deadlines (DLs) and response signals (RSs) are two well-established techniques for investigating spe...
<p><b>a.</b> Accuracy (% correct) as a function of reaction time for different coherence ranges, fro...
<p><b>A</b>, The standard task. Subjects viewed a horizontal bar (<i>L</i><sub>1</sub>) on a compute...
<p>A) Variability of response times for both probe blocks. Errorbars show standard error across subj...
<p>Vertical bars represent within-subject SEM. <b>A.</b> Top figure shows d′ values significantly de...
<p>Vertical bars represent within-subject SEM. <b>A.</b> Top figure shows d′ values significantly de...
<p>Bars show grand average behavioural accuracy as percentage correct (A) and grand average response...
<p>(<b>a</b>) Accuracy was lower in trials with novel sounds in comparison to those with standard so...
<p>D-prime (d′) was used to assess accuracy and response time (RT) was used to assess speed.</p
The speed–accuracy trade-off (SAT) suggests that time constraints reduce response accuracy. Its rele...
*<p>See <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0050425#s2" target="_b...
<p><b>A</b>, Subjects performed a modified experiment where a secondary task had to be performed bet...
<p>Proportion correct (PC) was used to assess accuracy and response time (RT) was used to assess spe...
<p>Subjects responded faster (lower median response times) and more consistently (lower mean within-...
In two experiments, we used response signals (RSs) to control processing time and trace out speed ac...
Deadlines (DLs) and response signals (RSs) are two well-established techniques for investigating spe...
<p><b>a.</b> Accuracy (% correct) as a function of reaction time for different coherence ranges, fro...
<p><b>A</b>, The standard task. Subjects viewed a horizontal bar (<i>L</i><sub>1</sub>) on a compute...
<p>A) Variability of response times for both probe blocks. Errorbars show standard error across subj...