<p>The first line indicates the main 4 protein types. SD, standard deviation; N, number of cultivars tested. Means followed by different letters each row are significantly different at <i>P</i> = 0.05 within one environment. <i>F</i> ratio and probability based on one-way analysis of variance.</p
<p>The subfigures A, B and C were the predicted results on the dataset S1, while D, E and F were for...
*<p>Example for reading. Hypothesis: cultivar [wild] > wild [cultivar] means: cultivars produce more...
(a) statistics of the proteins datasets, (b) comparative analysis with state-of-the-art model.</p
<p>Hap, haplotype; SD, standard deviation; N, number of cultivars tested. Within an environment, mea...
Standard deviations and significant digits were computed on 10 MCA samples, for each of 3,874 protei...
<p>The expected ratios and detected ratios are provided for the four standard proteins: P62894 (A), ...
<p>Three analysis methods were used to evaluate the abundance consistency of each individual candida...
<p>Simulations of total variability resulting from different random correlation matrices selected f...
<p>Proportion of proteins classified as differentially expressed by each model.</p>*<p>Difference in...
<p>Descriptive comparison of natural and random proteins by means of: boxplot of the variables distr...
<p>Notes: Means with similar letter(s) have no significant difference while different letters a,b,c,...
<p>a) Protein mean and variance values in <i>S. cerevisiae</i> plotted against each other in log-sca...
<p>All PS, overall number of protein spots with significant differences; PS, number of protein spots...
<p>Comparisons in each box include the Game-Howell test and the level of significance (p<0.05). Stat...
<p>A Welsh’s two-sample t-test was used to compare the mean frequencies and test for the likelihood ...
<p>The subfigures A, B and C were the predicted results on the dataset S1, while D, E and F were for...
*<p>Example for reading. Hypothesis: cultivar [wild] > wild [cultivar] means: cultivars produce more...
(a) statistics of the proteins datasets, (b) comparative analysis with state-of-the-art model.</p
<p>Hap, haplotype; SD, standard deviation; N, number of cultivars tested. Within an environment, mea...
Standard deviations and significant digits were computed on 10 MCA samples, for each of 3,874 protei...
<p>The expected ratios and detected ratios are provided for the four standard proteins: P62894 (A), ...
<p>Three analysis methods were used to evaluate the abundance consistency of each individual candida...
<p>Simulations of total variability resulting from different random correlation matrices selected f...
<p>Proportion of proteins classified as differentially expressed by each model.</p>*<p>Difference in...
<p>Descriptive comparison of natural and random proteins by means of: boxplot of the variables distr...
<p>Notes: Means with similar letter(s) have no significant difference while different letters a,b,c,...
<p>a) Protein mean and variance values in <i>S. cerevisiae</i> plotted against each other in log-sca...
<p>All PS, overall number of protein spots with significant differences; PS, number of protein spots...
<p>Comparisons in each box include the Game-Howell test and the level of significance (p<0.05). Stat...
<p>A Welsh’s two-sample t-test was used to compare the mean frequencies and test for the likelihood ...
<p>The subfigures A, B and C were the predicted results on the dataset S1, while D, E and F were for...
*<p>Example for reading. Hypothesis: cultivar [wild] > wild [cultivar] means: cultivars produce more...
(a) statistics of the proteins datasets, (b) comparative analysis with state-of-the-art model.</p
DOI
Add to ORKG