<p>For each network the total area of the patches in each habitat quality category (low, moderate, average, fair and high) is shown.</p
Habitat characteristics of the six neighborhoods based on percent forest, lawn/garden, and imperviou...
Relative habitat suitability model evaluation statistics among 11 modeling regions.</p
<p>Home ranges where benefits are greater than or equal to costs in a given habitat are considered v...
*<p>Connectivity was calculated by dividing the suitable area (sum of the area of all patches) by th...
<p>The figure displays a specific example, considering a 250 m neighborhood size and a characterizat...
Aim: The objective of conservation planning is often to prioritize patches based on their estimated...
Comparison of 6 candidate critical habitat networks (we developed) by size and percent of 1996 spott...
Aim The objective of conservation planning is often to prioritize patches based on their estimated c...
<p>One standard error of the mean was too small to be graphically depicted. All habitat depths were ...
<p>Color indicates resource quality from none (white) to low (light green) to high (dark green). Tot...
<p>Note: values that produce a network with>90% sightings points and the lowest network area is cons...
<p>No. is the number of habitats in regions; Total Area (Rank) is the total planar area measured in ...
<p>The number of stations belonging to each cluster was reported between parentheses. For a given ex...
<p>Grazers present = +G; Procedural control = PC; (A) intertidal and (B) subtidal habitats. Values a...
<p>Note that values for MPE and TE were scaled down by a factor of 1,000.</p><p>Summary statistics o...
Habitat characteristics of the six neighborhoods based on percent forest, lawn/garden, and imperviou...
Relative habitat suitability model evaluation statistics among 11 modeling regions.</p
<p>Home ranges where benefits are greater than or equal to costs in a given habitat are considered v...
*<p>Connectivity was calculated by dividing the suitable area (sum of the area of all patches) by th...
<p>The figure displays a specific example, considering a 250 m neighborhood size and a characterizat...
Aim: The objective of conservation planning is often to prioritize patches based on their estimated...
Comparison of 6 candidate critical habitat networks (we developed) by size and percent of 1996 spott...
Aim The objective of conservation planning is often to prioritize patches based on their estimated c...
<p>One standard error of the mean was too small to be graphically depicted. All habitat depths were ...
<p>Color indicates resource quality from none (white) to low (light green) to high (dark green). Tot...
<p>Note: values that produce a network with>90% sightings points and the lowest network area is cons...
<p>No. is the number of habitats in regions; Total Area (Rank) is the total planar area measured in ...
<p>The number of stations belonging to each cluster was reported between parentheses. For a given ex...
<p>Grazers present = +G; Procedural control = PC; (A) intertidal and (B) subtidal habitats. Values a...
<p>Note that values for MPE and TE were scaled down by a factor of 1,000.</p><p>Summary statistics o...
Habitat characteristics of the six neighborhoods based on percent forest, lawn/garden, and imperviou...
Relative habitat suitability model evaluation statistics among 11 modeling regions.</p
<p>Home ranges where benefits are greater than or equal to costs in a given habitat are considered v...
DOI
Add to ORKG