Phylogenetic clustering at HmB453k inferred by Maximum Likelihood.

<p>A phenotypic association regardless of species relationships is observed. Three major monophyletic clades (red, rays and no-red) are formed. Representative phenotypes of each clade are shown at the right (for full array of phenotypes and species see <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002752#pgen-1002752-g001" target="_blank">Figure 1</a>). (i) <i>H. m. malleti</i>, (ii) <i>H. m. plesseni</i>, (iii) <i>H. t. timareta</i>, (iv) <i>H. c. cydnides</i>, (v) <i>H. c. weymeri</i> f. <i>gustavi</i>, (vi) <i>H. timareta</i> subsp. nov, (vii) <i>H. c. weymeri</i> f. <i>weymeri</i>, (viii) <i>H. c. chioneus</i>, (ix) <i>H. c. cordula</i>, (x) <i>H. c. zelinde</i>, (xi) <i>H. c. warningery</i>, (xii) <i>H. c. lisethae</i>, (xiii) <i>H. m. cythera</i>, (xiv) <i>H. m. melpomene</i>, (xv) <i>H. m. rosina</i>, (xvi) <i>H. m. vulcanus</i>, (xvii) <i>H. heurippa</i>, (xix) <i>H. m. amandus</i>, (xx) <i>H. m. amaryllis</i>, (xxi) <i>H. timareta</i> subsp. nov, (xxii) <i>H. m. aglaope</i>, (xxiii) <i>H. t. florencia</i>, (xxiv) <i>H. t. contigua</i>, (xxv) <i>H. m. thelxiopeia</i>, (xxvi) <i>H. m. ecuadoriensis</i>. Numbers above branches are the values for bootstrap support. <i>H. m. plesseni</i> and some of <i>H. m. malleti</i> (rayed phenotype) do not cluster within the three major phenotypic clades.