<p>Percentage of correct predictions with standard error for the genotype data using single-task, multi-task, and concatenated models with varying sample sizes.</p
<p>Bulls in the training were genotyped on the 50 k panel, and bulls in the validation set were geno...
<p>Significant level is 5%.</p><p>Note: S denotes sample size in trios; L denotes the number of geno...
<p>Comparison of prediction accuracy on four binary classification datasets by varying the number of...
<p>Percentage of correct predictions with standard error for the genotype data using single-task, mu...
<p>Percentage of correct predictions with standard error for the expression data using single-task, ...
<p>Percentage of correct predictions for the breast cancer genotype data using single-task, multi-ta...
<p>Genotype error rates according to reference population when a) 1% or b) 20% of genotypes were mas...
<p>Percentage of correct predictions with standard error using summed prediction, summed enrichment ...
<p>Genotype error rates according to Pima Indian reference population size when a) 1% or b) 20% of g...
<p>Percentage of correct predictions for the breast cancer expression data using single-task, multi-...
<p>Call rate refers to the percentage of called genotypes while the accuracy is computed as the numb...
<p>Comparison of prediction accuracy on four multiclass classification datasets by varying the numbe...
<p>Estimated effect size (partial eta squared) of <i>CHRNA4</i> genotype as a function of load condi...
<p>Comparison of prediction accuracy on four multiclass classification datasets by varying the numbe...
<p>Significant level is 5%.</p><p>Note: S denotes sample size in trios; L denotes the number of geno...
<p>Bulls in the training were genotyped on the 50 k panel, and bulls in the validation set were geno...
<p>Significant level is 5%.</p><p>Note: S denotes sample size in trios; L denotes the number of geno...
<p>Comparison of prediction accuracy on four binary classification datasets by varying the number of...
<p>Percentage of correct predictions with standard error for the genotype data using single-task, mu...
<p>Percentage of correct predictions with standard error for the expression data using single-task, ...
<p>Percentage of correct predictions for the breast cancer genotype data using single-task, multi-ta...
<p>Genotype error rates according to reference population when a) 1% or b) 20% of genotypes were mas...
<p>Percentage of correct predictions with standard error using summed prediction, summed enrichment ...
<p>Genotype error rates according to Pima Indian reference population size when a) 1% or b) 20% of g...
<p>Percentage of correct predictions for the breast cancer expression data using single-task, multi-...
<p>Call rate refers to the percentage of called genotypes while the accuracy is computed as the numb...
<p>Comparison of prediction accuracy on four multiclass classification datasets by varying the numbe...
<p>Estimated effect size (partial eta squared) of <i>CHRNA4</i> genotype as a function of load condi...
<p>Comparison of prediction accuracy on four multiclass classification datasets by varying the numbe...
<p>Significant level is 5%.</p><p>Note: S denotes sample size in trios; L denotes the number of geno...
<p>Bulls in the training were genotyped on the 50 k panel, and bulls in the validation set were geno...
<p>Significant level is 5%.</p><p>Note: S denotes sample size in trios; L denotes the number of geno...
<p>Comparison of prediction accuracy on four binary classification datasets by varying the number of...
DOI
Add to ORKG