<p>See the section of “Analysis of the optimal feature set” for further explanation.</p
<p>The impact on the domain prediction from (<b>A</b>) the five different feature types, and (<b>B</...
<p>The bar represents the MDGI Z-Scores of the corresponding feature group. We group the features in...
<p>Histogram showing (A) the distribution of subtypes of the conservation score features; (B) the di...
<p>See the section of “PSSM conservation score feature analysis” for further explanation.</p
<p>It can be seen from panel A that of the 51 optimal features, 16 were obtained from PSSM conservat...
<p>The solid bars, checked bars, gray bars, light gray bars and hatched bars represent features of P...
<p>It can be seen from panel A that both CX and DPX contribute to the prediction of PPI sites, and t...
<p>The 125 features were obtained by combining the 3 optimal feature sets for the 3 datasets. The hi...
<p>Gray bars, light gray bars and hatched bars represented features of conservation scores, secondar...
<p>Feature distribution of optimal feature subset generated by correlation based feature selection.<...
<p>When the 65 features were used, a peak of MCC was obtained. These 65 features were considered as ...
<p>The IFS curves were drawn based on the data in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/1...
<p>The number of features in the optimal feature set for each dataset and the MCC values obtained by...
<p>It can be seen from panel A that the secondary structural feature was the most important one for ...
The optimal number features were based on feature selection performance, as shown here, by selecting...
<p>The impact on the domain prediction from (<b>A</b>) the five different feature types, and (<b>B</...
<p>The bar represents the MDGI Z-Scores of the corresponding feature group. We group the features in...
<p>Histogram showing (A) the distribution of subtypes of the conservation score features; (B) the di...
<p>See the section of “PSSM conservation score feature analysis” for further explanation.</p
<p>It can be seen from panel A that of the 51 optimal features, 16 were obtained from PSSM conservat...
<p>The solid bars, checked bars, gray bars, light gray bars and hatched bars represent features of P...
<p>It can be seen from panel A that both CX and DPX contribute to the prediction of PPI sites, and t...
<p>The 125 features were obtained by combining the 3 optimal feature sets for the 3 datasets. The hi...
<p>Gray bars, light gray bars and hatched bars represented features of conservation scores, secondar...
<p>Feature distribution of optimal feature subset generated by correlation based feature selection.<...
<p>When the 65 features were used, a peak of MCC was obtained. These 65 features were considered as ...
<p>The IFS curves were drawn based on the data in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/1...
<p>The number of features in the optimal feature set for each dataset and the MCC values obtained by...
<p>It can be seen from panel A that the secondary structural feature was the most important one for ...
The optimal number features were based on feature selection performance, as shown here, by selecting...
<p>The impact on the domain prediction from (<b>A</b>) the five different feature types, and (<b>B</...
<p>The bar represents the MDGI Z-Scores of the corresponding feature group. We group the features in...
<p>Histogram showing (A) the distribution of subtypes of the conservation score features; (B) the di...
DOI
Add to ORKG