<p>Time comparison of the proposed Scatter SVM to the OVR LIBSVM training strategy.</p
<p><b>A.</b> A comparison of time allocation in the training session with the experimental session. ...
<p>There are 10 independent runs on the training (LFP-TRN) and test (LFP-TEST) data sets.</p
Computational time comparison of five methods on blocks drawn from six data sets (seconds).</p
The comparison of performance and time consumption between SVM-RFE and SVM-VSSRFE.</p
<p>a) CPU running time for complete training and classification of UniProtKB.</p><p>b) HMM running t...
<p>Descriptive data of SVV for each time and condition, and comparisons between pairs of conditions ...
<p>Comparison of the training time and forecasting accuracy (training 40%, testing 60%).</p
<p>A: Simulation results on different time lengths fixing the input spike rate to 10 Hz. B: Simulati...
<p>(A) The ratio of SVM-RBF grid-search time to ELM training time. (B) The ratio of SVM-Linear grid-...
Comparison of CPU iteration time of the proposed model with CV, LVC and LSACM.</p
Group comparison regarding time allocation during the simulation, perception, and learning.</p
<p>Illustration of overall average time savings by the proposed method against HM at different bit-r...
<p>Time comparison among different software for densest genomic models tested in the study.</p
<p>The performance comparison of the models trained with different sequence lengths.</p
<p>Comparison of our approach and counterpart algorithms in terms of running time (<i>s</i>).</p
<p><b>A.</b> A comparison of time allocation in the training session with the experimental session. ...
<p>There are 10 independent runs on the training (LFP-TRN) and test (LFP-TEST) data sets.</p
Computational time comparison of five methods on blocks drawn from six data sets (seconds).</p
The comparison of performance and time consumption between SVM-RFE and SVM-VSSRFE.</p
<p>a) CPU running time for complete training and classification of UniProtKB.</p><p>b) HMM running t...
<p>Descriptive data of SVV for each time and condition, and comparisons between pairs of conditions ...
<p>Comparison of the training time and forecasting accuracy (training 40%, testing 60%).</p
<p>A: Simulation results on different time lengths fixing the input spike rate to 10 Hz. B: Simulati...
<p>(A) The ratio of SVM-RBF grid-search time to ELM training time. (B) The ratio of SVM-Linear grid-...
Comparison of CPU iteration time of the proposed model with CV, LVC and LSACM.</p
Group comparison regarding time allocation during the simulation, perception, and learning.</p
<p>Illustration of overall average time savings by the proposed method against HM at different bit-r...
<p>Time comparison among different software for densest genomic models tested in the study.</p
<p>The performance comparison of the models trained with different sequence lengths.</p
<p>Comparison of our approach and counterpart algorithms in terms of running time (<i>s</i>).</p
<p><b>A.</b> A comparison of time allocation in the training session with the experimental session. ...
<p>There are 10 independent runs on the training (LFP-TRN) and test (LFP-TEST) data sets.</p
Computational time comparison of five methods on blocks drawn from six data sets (seconds).</p
DOI
Add to ORKG