<p>When several litter quality traits significantly explained litter mass loss or SIR, all the corresponding models from stepwise regression analysis are displayed (in bold). When no litter trait significantly explained the variable (<i>p</i>>0.05), the best model is shown.</p
<p>Mixing leaf litter often stimulated litter PLFA concentrations and mass loss above expected value...
<p>Mean values with standard deviation in parentheses (fresh litter: n = 6, aged litter: n = 10).</p
<p>Model averaged β coefficient, 95% confidence intervals and weights associated with habitat use th...
<p>* stands for the changes of litter chemical traits, including both the amount and the concentrati...
<p>Net fertilization effects are defined as the absolute difference between values measured on contr...
<p>The model predicts an optimal genotypic value for litter size at <i>3.05</i> with a variance <i>σ...
<p>Analyses of litter mixing effects for litter mass loss and nutrient release were performed by mix...
<p>Values are means (<i>n</i> = 5) ± SE. <i>CL1</i> soil + 1 g litter from control plots, <i>CL2</i>...
<p>Relationship between litter mass and sediment concentration for bare-soil plots (open diamonds), ...
<p>Runoff yield versus litter mass for five rainfall intensities for bare-soil plots (Litter mass eq...
Foliar functional traits have been shown to strongly co-vary with each other and with rates of litte...
<p>Relationship between litter mass and sediment yield for bare-soil plots (open diamonds), <i>Querc...
<p>Different capital letters indicate significant differences among different periods for a specific...
<p>Initial litter quality parameters measured for leaf litter from the six different tree species us...
<p>Values are means (<i>n</i> = 5) ± SE. Different letters indicate significant differences (<i>P</i...
<p>Mixing leaf litter often stimulated litter PLFA concentrations and mass loss above expected value...
<p>Mean values with standard deviation in parentheses (fresh litter: n = 6, aged litter: n = 10).</p
<p>Model averaged β coefficient, 95% confidence intervals and weights associated with habitat use th...
<p>* stands for the changes of litter chemical traits, including both the amount and the concentrati...
<p>Net fertilization effects are defined as the absolute difference between values measured on contr...
<p>The model predicts an optimal genotypic value for litter size at <i>3.05</i> with a variance <i>σ...
<p>Analyses of litter mixing effects for litter mass loss and nutrient release were performed by mix...
<p>Values are means (<i>n</i> = 5) ± SE. <i>CL1</i> soil + 1 g litter from control plots, <i>CL2</i>...
<p>Relationship between litter mass and sediment concentration for bare-soil plots (open diamonds), ...
<p>Runoff yield versus litter mass for five rainfall intensities for bare-soil plots (Litter mass eq...
Foliar functional traits have been shown to strongly co-vary with each other and with rates of litte...
<p>Relationship between litter mass and sediment yield for bare-soil plots (open diamonds), <i>Querc...
<p>Different capital letters indicate significant differences among different periods for a specific...
<p>Initial litter quality parameters measured for leaf litter from the six different tree species us...
<p>Values are means (<i>n</i> = 5) ± SE. Different letters indicate significant differences (<i>P</i...
<p>Mixing leaf litter often stimulated litter PLFA concentrations and mass loss above expected value...
<p>Mean values with standard deviation in parentheses (fresh litter: n = 6, aged litter: n = 10).</p
<p>Model averaged β coefficient, 95% confidence intervals and weights associated with habitat use th...