<p>See <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0054109#pone-0054109-t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a> for test results.</p
<p>Note: UG, LG, MG, and HG are four grazing intensities: un-grazed; lightly grazed; moderately graz...
<p>*Satterthwaite’s approximate degrees of freedom given unequal variances.</p><p>The table contains...
Ground cover percentage of different crop residue types and ages estimated by ASSESS 2.0 [45].</p
<p>See <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0054109#pone-0054109-t0...
<p>See <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0054109#pone-0054109-t0...
Mean percent N (± 1 SE) for treatment plots across the growing season from 2014–2016 (n = 6 replicat...
Mean percent C (± 1 SE) for treatment plots across the growing season from 2014–2016 (n = 6 replicat...
<p>Values are mean ± SE (n = 4). Abbreviations for treatments are defined in <a href="http://www.plo...
Error bars are the 95% bootstrapped confidence intervals. The numbers inside and outside the parenth...
(a) Percent total vegetation cover and (b) percent litter cover in grazed (sheep) and ungrazed (excl...
<p>Mean cover of vegetation and particle size of the ground at study sites of alpine region, mountai...
Livestock production and wildlife habitat objectives become antagonistic on grasslands when the arch...
<p><b>Note:</b> The bold lower case represents the result of variance analysis at 0.05 level.</p><p>...
Percent cover of all plant species identified for summer dates in the experiment
<p>The thin dotted line shows the no-selection expectation where probability of grazing tussock equa...
<p>Note: UG, LG, MG, and HG are four grazing intensities: un-grazed; lightly grazed; moderately graz...
<p>*Satterthwaite’s approximate degrees of freedom given unequal variances.</p><p>The table contains...
Ground cover percentage of different crop residue types and ages estimated by ASSESS 2.0 [45].</p
<p>See <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0054109#pone-0054109-t0...
<p>See <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0054109#pone-0054109-t0...
Mean percent N (± 1 SE) for treatment plots across the growing season from 2014–2016 (n = 6 replicat...
Mean percent C (± 1 SE) for treatment plots across the growing season from 2014–2016 (n = 6 replicat...
<p>Values are mean ± SE (n = 4). Abbreviations for treatments are defined in <a href="http://www.plo...
Error bars are the 95% bootstrapped confidence intervals. The numbers inside and outside the parenth...
(a) Percent total vegetation cover and (b) percent litter cover in grazed (sheep) and ungrazed (excl...
<p>Mean cover of vegetation and particle size of the ground at study sites of alpine region, mountai...
Livestock production and wildlife habitat objectives become antagonistic on grasslands when the arch...
<p><b>Note:</b> The bold lower case represents the result of variance analysis at 0.05 level.</p><p>...
Percent cover of all plant species identified for summer dates in the experiment
<p>The thin dotted line shows the no-selection expectation where probability of grazing tussock equa...
<p>Note: UG, LG, MG, and HG are four grazing intensities: un-grazed; lightly grazed; moderately graz...
<p>*Satterthwaite’s approximate degrees of freedom given unequal variances.</p><p>The table contains...
Ground cover percentage of different crop residue types and ages estimated by ASSESS 2.0 [45].</p
DOI
Add to ORKG