<p>The effects of different scan session, scanner, and surface extraction tool are evaluated and each case is marked in the cells of the matrix. For the subject scanned 3 times, 6×6 matrix is constructed without rows and columns of AMC_MNI and AMC_FS.</p
<p>A) Ten regions were defined in the SOM grid (black solid lines), based on hierarchical clustering...
Conventional methods of map comparison frequently produce unhelpful results for a variety of reasons...
Quantitative comparisons of restoration results in average MSSIM value for the test images.</p
<p>Spatial difference (mm) of sulcal pits (<i>M<sub>2</sub></i>) according to effects of scan sessio...
<div><p>Sulcal pit analysis has been providing novel insights into brain function and development. T...
<p>The location and existence of the sulcal pits are highly similar across surfaces. All surfaces ar...
<p>Scalp maps for all subjects (each row represents one subject) between 300 and 400 ms for the comp...
<p>The matrices indicate a) the intercorrelations among node-pairs for Session 1 (lower triangle) an...
This paper describes three important inter-related factors in multiple-resolution categorical map co...
<p>Scalp maps for all subjects (each row represents one subject) between 200 and 400 ms for the comp...
Spatial comparison of the fMRI off-border localization and the three different MEG localization meth...
<p>Quantitative comparison of the images reconstructed with LSQR using matrices in different ranges....
Matrix table comparing the amount of genome wide overlapping SV calls detected by four WGS technolog...
<p>Scalp maps for all subjects (each row represents one subject) between 300 and 400 ms for the comp...
Comparison of confusion matrices between Findaureus and Otsu’s thresholding method findings, as pres...
<p>A) Ten regions were defined in the SOM grid (black solid lines), based on hierarchical clustering...
Conventional methods of map comparison frequently produce unhelpful results for a variety of reasons...
Quantitative comparisons of restoration results in average MSSIM value for the test images.</p
<p>Spatial difference (mm) of sulcal pits (<i>M<sub>2</sub></i>) according to effects of scan sessio...
<div><p>Sulcal pit analysis has been providing novel insights into brain function and development. T...
<p>The location and existence of the sulcal pits are highly similar across surfaces. All surfaces ar...
<p>Scalp maps for all subjects (each row represents one subject) between 300 and 400 ms for the comp...
<p>The matrices indicate a) the intercorrelations among node-pairs for Session 1 (lower triangle) an...
This paper describes three important inter-related factors in multiple-resolution categorical map co...
<p>Scalp maps for all subjects (each row represents one subject) between 200 and 400 ms for the comp...
Spatial comparison of the fMRI off-border localization and the three different MEG localization meth...
<p>Quantitative comparison of the images reconstructed with LSQR using matrices in different ranges....
Matrix table comparing the amount of genome wide overlapping SV calls detected by four WGS technolog...
<p>Scalp maps for all subjects (each row represents one subject) between 300 and 400 ms for the comp...
Comparison of confusion matrices between Findaureus and Otsu’s thresholding method findings, as pres...
<p>A) Ten regions were defined in the SOM grid (black solid lines), based on hierarchical clustering...
Conventional methods of map comparison frequently produce unhelpful results for a variety of reasons...
Quantitative comparisons of restoration results in average MSSIM value for the test images.</p