<p>Each section was scored 0, 1, or 2 in each of three areas, and the scores were summed to give an overall index of quality.</p
Methodological quality of studies included in the final analysis based on the NOS for assessing the ...
Criteria for the quality assessment of the studies (adapted from Joanna Briggs Institute Prevalence ...
Methodological quality assessment of studies on psychometric properties of the included measures.</p
<p>For the report of Stump (2009), of the possible 45, the figure represents only the 16 controversi...
<p>For the study of Tyl et al. (2002), of the 45 criteria, the figure represents only the 35 controv...
<p>Following systematic review, study quality was evaluated according to previously published criter...
<p>Allocation of scores to morphological parameter observations (completely described by Tona et al....
Overall quality score of assessments for each psychometric property based on levels of evidence by S...
<p>Segmentation quality scoring of each 3D lower jaw model derived from the test series.</p
<p>The assessment of methodological quality items shown as percentages across all included studies.<...
Quantitative characters evaluated for specimens of each geographic region, and results of quantitati...
<p>Eight of the twelve respondents agreed to select a subset of up to 15 criteria that they consider...
<p>Segmentation quality scoring of each 3D lower jaw model derived from the validation series.</p
<p>Summary of the methodological quality assessment of the reviewed studies according to the 14 QUAD...
<p>Showing factors relevant to study quality including histograms of a) numbers of participants with...
Methodological quality of studies included in the final analysis based on the NOS for assessing the ...
Criteria for the quality assessment of the studies (adapted from Joanna Briggs Institute Prevalence ...
Methodological quality assessment of studies on psychometric properties of the included measures.</p
<p>For the report of Stump (2009), of the possible 45, the figure represents only the 16 controversi...
<p>For the study of Tyl et al. (2002), of the 45 criteria, the figure represents only the 35 controv...
<p>Following systematic review, study quality was evaluated according to previously published criter...
<p>Allocation of scores to morphological parameter observations (completely described by Tona et al....
Overall quality score of assessments for each psychometric property based on levels of evidence by S...
<p>Segmentation quality scoring of each 3D lower jaw model derived from the test series.</p
<p>The assessment of methodological quality items shown as percentages across all included studies.<...
Quantitative characters evaluated for specimens of each geographic region, and results of quantitati...
<p>Eight of the twelve respondents agreed to select a subset of up to 15 criteria that they consider...
<p>Segmentation quality scoring of each 3D lower jaw model derived from the validation series.</p
<p>Summary of the methodological quality assessment of the reviewed studies according to the 14 QUAD...
<p>Showing factors relevant to study quality including histograms of a) numbers of participants with...
Methodological quality of studies included in the final analysis based on the NOS for assessing the ...
Criteria for the quality assessment of the studies (adapted from Joanna Briggs Institute Prevalence ...
Methodological quality assessment of studies on psychometric properties of the included measures.</p
DOI
Add to ORKG