<p>The observed means (with 95% CI) for the two types of response latency measured in Experiments 2A and 2B as a function of S-R Compatibility of the trials. The values of the means, confidence intervals and size of the Compatibility Effect (CE) are reported in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0054094#pone.0054094.s001" target="_blank">Table S1</a>. In Experiment 2A participants had to press and hold down the correct key upon stimulus presentation, in Experiment 2B participants had to release the correct key upon stimulus presentation.</p
response more quickly, regardless of stimulus–response compatibility. condition). The difference in ...
<p>Mean response latencies (in ms) and mean error rates (in percentages) as a function of response a...
In serial stage models, perception and action are usually thought to be linked to each other by an S...
<p>The observed means (with 95% CI) for the two types of response latency measured in Experiment 1 a...
<p>The observed means (with 95% CI) for the two types of response latency measured in Experiments 3A...
<p>The acquisition phase of both versions of the experiment was identical, consisting of two respons...
<p>Mean response latencies (in ms) and mean error rates (in percentages) as a function of trial type...
An experiment was conducted to determine whether or not response-response compatability effects were...
Hypotheses about variations of response force have emphasised the influences of arousal and of motor...
<p>The figure illustrates the results of Experiment 1 regarding the noise compatibility effect on re...
The present study was designed to examine the hypothesis that stimulus–response arrangements with hi...
<p><b>a.</b> Accuracy (% correct) as a function of reaction time for one subject in a block of trial...
Schonard C, Xiong A, Proctor R, Janczyk M. Examination of a response-effect compatibility task with ...
A tactile, two-choice, reaction time experiment is reported in which the effects of stimulus-respons...
<p>Bars represent the distance between conforming and non-conforming conditions in milliseconds. Pos...
response more quickly, regardless of stimulus–response compatibility. condition). The difference in ...
<p>Mean response latencies (in ms) and mean error rates (in percentages) as a function of response a...
In serial stage models, perception and action are usually thought to be linked to each other by an S...
<p>The observed means (with 95% CI) for the two types of response latency measured in Experiment 1 a...
<p>The observed means (with 95% CI) for the two types of response latency measured in Experiments 3A...
<p>The acquisition phase of both versions of the experiment was identical, consisting of two respons...
<p>Mean response latencies (in ms) and mean error rates (in percentages) as a function of trial type...
An experiment was conducted to determine whether or not response-response compatability effects were...
Hypotheses about variations of response force have emphasised the influences of arousal and of motor...
<p>The figure illustrates the results of Experiment 1 regarding the noise compatibility effect on re...
The present study was designed to examine the hypothesis that stimulus–response arrangements with hi...
<p><b>a.</b> Accuracy (% correct) as a function of reaction time for one subject in a block of trial...
Schonard C, Xiong A, Proctor R, Janczyk M. Examination of a response-effect compatibility task with ...
A tactile, two-choice, reaction time experiment is reported in which the effects of stimulus-respons...
<p>Bars represent the distance between conforming and non-conforming conditions in milliseconds. Pos...
response more quickly, regardless of stimulus–response compatibility. condition). The difference in ...
<p>Mean response latencies (in ms) and mean error rates (in percentages) as a function of response a...
In serial stage models, perception and action are usually thought to be linked to each other by an S...