<p>Top: an example of the center of mass (CoM) movement of two rowers (solid lines) and the movement of the ergometers (dashed line) during inphase (A) and antiphase rowing (B). The bars below the CoM movement indicate the duration of backward (cf. drive phase; dark grey) and forward (cf. recovery phase; light grey) CoM movement of both rowers. Bottom: continuous relative phase between the CoM movements during inphase (C) and antiphase rowing (D). The intended relative phase is displayed by the dotted lines.</p
It is generally accepted that crew rowing requires perfect synchronization between the movements of ...
It is generally accepted that crew rowing requires perfect synchronization between the movements of ...
Interpersonal movement coordination is characterized by stable coordination patterns. We examined th...
<p>Movements of rowers (upper panel) and ‘boat’ (middle panel), and continuous relative phase (lower...
Although most research on interpersonal coordination focuses on perceptual forms of interaction, man...
The purpose of this study was to identify the coupling relationships between body segments joint ang...
Coordinative couplings are commonly classified as interpersonal and intrapersonal. Interpersonal coo...
In rowing, perfect synchronisation is important for optimal performance of a crew. Remarkably, a rec...
The aim of this study was to analyse the phenomena associated with coordination between a crew of ro...
<p>Typical inter-personal coordination paradigm (A) where visual information about finger movement i...
It is generally accepted that crew rowing requires perfect synchronization between the movements of ...
Complex systems applications in human movement sciences have increased our understanding of emergent...
It is generally accepted that crew rowing requires perfect synchronization between the movements of ...
Rowing presents a unique perception–action problem. The challenge is not for rowers to try to coupl...
Evidence currently supports the view that intentional interpersonal coordination (IIC) is a self-org...
It is generally accepted that crew rowing requires perfect synchronization between the movements of ...
It is generally accepted that crew rowing requires perfect synchronization between the movements of ...
Interpersonal movement coordination is characterized by stable coordination patterns. We examined th...
<p>Movements of rowers (upper panel) and ‘boat’ (middle panel), and continuous relative phase (lower...
Although most research on interpersonal coordination focuses on perceptual forms of interaction, man...
The purpose of this study was to identify the coupling relationships between body segments joint ang...
Coordinative couplings are commonly classified as interpersonal and intrapersonal. Interpersonal coo...
In rowing, perfect synchronisation is important for optimal performance of a crew. Remarkably, a rec...
The aim of this study was to analyse the phenomena associated with coordination between a crew of ro...
<p>Typical inter-personal coordination paradigm (A) where visual information about finger movement i...
It is generally accepted that crew rowing requires perfect synchronization between the movements of ...
Complex systems applications in human movement sciences have increased our understanding of emergent...
It is generally accepted that crew rowing requires perfect synchronization between the movements of ...
Rowing presents a unique perception–action problem. The challenge is not for rowers to try to coupl...
Evidence currently supports the view that intentional interpersonal coordination (IIC) is a self-org...
It is generally accepted that crew rowing requires perfect synchronization between the movements of ...
It is generally accepted that crew rowing requires perfect synchronization between the movements of ...
Interpersonal movement coordination is characterized by stable coordination patterns. We examined th...