<p>hES-MP002.5 cells and BM-MSCs were trypsinized and stained with different combinations of antibodies for flow cytometric analysis. The data are presented as histograms. The percentage of the maximum of the number of cells in each channel is shown on the y-axis. Samples are presented in the shaded plots, corresponding isotype controls are shown as open lines. hES-MP002.5 cells and BM-MSCs showed comparable surface marker expression profiles, except for differences in CD90 expression. Representative histograms of one of three independent experiments are shown.</p
<p>After 3 passages, CD45<sup>−</sup>/Ter119<sup>−</sup> cells were stained with the following surfa...
<p>A Flow cytometry analysis of chemokine receptor expression on the cell surface of human MSCs. Che...
<p>Human ESC and hiPSC were induced to differentiate in parallel using identical differentiation pro...
<p>Surface antigen profile analysis by flow cytometry for the derived MSC-like cells. (A) and (C) ar...
<p>Confirmation of MSC identity by flow cytometry analysis. Cells were positive for CD29 (99.7%), CD...
<p>(A) Expression of surface markers CD14, CD19, CD34, CD45, HLA-DR, CD73, CD90, CD105 (filled) with...
<p>Flow cytometry histograms from a representative population of passage 2 human ASCs for mesenchyma...
<p>Both SFCs and SFMSCs expressed similar surface markers, including CD90, CD44, CD105, and CD73. St...
<p>A) Cells were analyzed by flow cytometry for MSC surface markers CD29, Sca1; hematopoietic marker...
<p>(A) Dot plot of gated living P2 NPCs followed by respective histograms of NPCs stained for the ce...
<p>A) A single flow cytometric analysis is shown to exemplify SSEA1 and ITGAV expression properties ...
<p>Data are representative for all flow cytometry experiments. (A) Forward scatter vs. side scatter ...
<p>(A) Representative micrographs of photics microscopy obtained on BMSCs (original magnification ×2...
<p>All the ADMSCs and BMMSCs were immune-positive for the MSCs cell surface markers: CD44, CD73, CD9...
Surface marker expression for MSCs’ identity of hUC-MSCs and hDPSCs, assessed by Flow cytometry.</p
<p>After 3 passages, CD45<sup>−</sup>/Ter119<sup>−</sup> cells were stained with the following surfa...
<p>A Flow cytometry analysis of chemokine receptor expression on the cell surface of human MSCs. Che...
<p>Human ESC and hiPSC were induced to differentiate in parallel using identical differentiation pro...
<p>Surface antigen profile analysis by flow cytometry for the derived MSC-like cells. (A) and (C) ar...
<p>Confirmation of MSC identity by flow cytometry analysis. Cells were positive for CD29 (99.7%), CD...
<p>(A) Expression of surface markers CD14, CD19, CD34, CD45, HLA-DR, CD73, CD90, CD105 (filled) with...
<p>Flow cytometry histograms from a representative population of passage 2 human ASCs for mesenchyma...
<p>Both SFCs and SFMSCs expressed similar surface markers, including CD90, CD44, CD105, and CD73. St...
<p>A) Cells were analyzed by flow cytometry for MSC surface markers CD29, Sca1; hematopoietic marker...
<p>(A) Dot plot of gated living P2 NPCs followed by respective histograms of NPCs stained for the ce...
<p>A) A single flow cytometric analysis is shown to exemplify SSEA1 and ITGAV expression properties ...
<p>Data are representative for all flow cytometry experiments. (A) Forward scatter vs. side scatter ...
<p>(A) Representative micrographs of photics microscopy obtained on BMSCs (original magnification ×2...
<p>All the ADMSCs and BMMSCs were immune-positive for the MSCs cell surface markers: CD44, CD73, CD9...
Surface marker expression for MSCs’ identity of hUC-MSCs and hDPSCs, assessed by Flow cytometry.</p
<p>After 3 passages, CD45<sup>−</sup>/Ter119<sup>−</sup> cells were stained with the following surfa...
<p>A Flow cytometry analysis of chemokine receptor expression on the cell surface of human MSCs. Che...
<p>Human ESC and hiPSC were induced to differentiate in parallel using identical differentiation pro...