<p>Discriminability estimates with 95% binomial confidence intervals are shown by model as a function of patch size, where data are pooled over subjects. Sixteen subjects participated in session one with RND, ICA, L2, LP, IPS, and GPS, and 12 participated in session two with the MEC models. Each subject performed 30 test trials per data point in the plot. Therefore, each data point for session one is based on trials, and each for session two is based on trials.</p
To obtain these plots we gradually increased the w-parameter from 0 to 1 in .1 steps, each time simu...
These results are similar to those presented in Fig 2, except that the decision to publish takes the...
We compare the sample size requirements for significance tests and confidence intervals by calculati...
<p><b>A.</b> Discriminability estimates with 95% binomial confidence intervals plotted in order of i...
<p><b>A.</b> Discriminability estimates with 95% binomial confidence intervals are shown by model as...
<p>Discriminability estimates are plotted with 95% binomial confidence intervals. Nine subjects part...
Correct answers are more likely with higher confidence (left panel), confidence in correct trials is...
<p>(A). Overview of the experimental design: Each trial began with a fixation cross followed by the ...
<p>Psychophysical (open symbols) and model (closed symbols) direction discrimination performances ar...
<p>Significant results are in bold.</p><p>Individuals' performance on the first choice of each sessi...
<p>Confidence limits obtained for LF/HF power ratio (P<sub>LFHF</sub>), frequency of the LF componen...
(A) Reconstruction of simulated epidemics from arrival testing data, assuming 100 arrivals tested pe...
Plot of mean bias and mean 95% confidence interval width over all datasets within each scenario for ...
The panels on the left show the estimated responses and associated confidence intervals of all recep...
<p>Diagnostic trials are those in which there is at least one disagreement between the models. For e...
To obtain these plots we gradually increased the w-parameter from 0 to 1 in .1 steps, each time simu...
These results are similar to those presented in Fig 2, except that the decision to publish takes the...
We compare the sample size requirements for significance tests and confidence intervals by calculati...
<p><b>A.</b> Discriminability estimates with 95% binomial confidence intervals plotted in order of i...
<p><b>A.</b> Discriminability estimates with 95% binomial confidence intervals are shown by model as...
<p>Discriminability estimates are plotted with 95% binomial confidence intervals. Nine subjects part...
Correct answers are more likely with higher confidence (left panel), confidence in correct trials is...
<p>(A). Overview of the experimental design: Each trial began with a fixation cross followed by the ...
<p>Psychophysical (open symbols) and model (closed symbols) direction discrimination performances ar...
<p>Significant results are in bold.</p><p>Individuals' performance on the first choice of each sessi...
<p>Confidence limits obtained for LF/HF power ratio (P<sub>LFHF</sub>), frequency of the LF componen...
(A) Reconstruction of simulated epidemics from arrival testing data, assuming 100 arrivals tested pe...
Plot of mean bias and mean 95% confidence interval width over all datasets within each scenario for ...
The panels on the left show the estimated responses and associated confidence intervals of all recep...
<p>Diagnostic trials are those in which there is at least one disagreement between the models. For e...
To obtain these plots we gradually increased the w-parameter from 0 to 1 in .1 steps, each time simu...
These results are similar to those presented in Fig 2, except that the decision to publish takes the...
We compare the sample size requirements for significance tests and confidence intervals by calculati...