<p>The CCE was calculated as incongruent reaction times minus congruent reaction times. White bars represent the condition in which visual stimuli were presented to the same visual hemifield with tactile stimuli, black bars represent trials in which the visual stimuli were presented to the different hemifield. The bars on the left side are for the uncrossed posture and bars on the right side are for the crossed posture.</p
We investigated whether the crossmodal congruency effect, normally observed in spatial compatibility...
<p>Mean reaction times (ms) in the MI, MC, and MN contexts for incongruent, congruent and neutral it...
<p>The left and the right panels illustrate performance in the WM and in the attention condition, re...
<p>The CCE was calculated as incongruent reaction times minus congruent reaction times. White bars r...
<p>The left column represents data for congruent conditions, the middle column for incongruent condi...
<p>The left column represents data for congruent conditions, the middle column for incongruent condi...
Crossmodal interference shown by Set (1 [passive], 2, 3, 4) Tool Arrangement (uncrossed, crossed) an...
The incorporation of feedback into a person’s body schema is well established. The crossmodal congru...
Crossmodal interference shown by Tool Arrangement (uncrossed [U], crossed [C]) and Visual Field (sam...
<p>Mean congruency effects in reaction time in milliseconds (RT in incongruent trials minus RT in co...
<p>Response proportions from anatomically incongruent trials were subtracted from response proportio...
The incorporation of feedback into a person’s body schema is well established. The crossmodal congru...
<p>a) Proportion of correct responses for each facial expression, presented by posture. b) Median re...
<p>Mean congruency effects in reaction time in milliseconds (RT in incongruent trials minus RT in co...
<p>Mean congruency effects in reaction time in milliseconds (RT in incongruent trials minus RT in co...
We investigated whether the crossmodal congruency effect, normally observed in spatial compatibility...
<p>Mean reaction times (ms) in the MI, MC, and MN contexts for incongruent, congruent and neutral it...
<p>The left and the right panels illustrate performance in the WM and in the attention condition, re...
<p>The CCE was calculated as incongruent reaction times minus congruent reaction times. White bars r...
<p>The left column represents data for congruent conditions, the middle column for incongruent condi...
<p>The left column represents data for congruent conditions, the middle column for incongruent condi...
Crossmodal interference shown by Set (1 [passive], 2, 3, 4) Tool Arrangement (uncrossed, crossed) an...
The incorporation of feedback into a person’s body schema is well established. The crossmodal congru...
Crossmodal interference shown by Tool Arrangement (uncrossed [U], crossed [C]) and Visual Field (sam...
<p>Mean congruency effects in reaction time in milliseconds (RT in incongruent trials minus RT in co...
<p>Response proportions from anatomically incongruent trials were subtracted from response proportio...
The incorporation of feedback into a person’s body schema is well established. The crossmodal congru...
<p>a) Proportion of correct responses for each facial expression, presented by posture. b) Median re...
<p>Mean congruency effects in reaction time in milliseconds (RT in incongruent trials minus RT in co...
<p>Mean congruency effects in reaction time in milliseconds (RT in incongruent trials minus RT in co...
We investigated whether the crossmodal congruency effect, normally observed in spatial compatibility...
<p>Mean reaction times (ms) in the MI, MC, and MN contexts for incongruent, congruent and neutral it...
<p>The left and the right panels illustrate performance in the WM and in the attention condition, re...