<p>(a–c) Spectrograms (frequency, kHz * time, s) of courtship songs produced by each genotype. (A) Mean peak frequency during 3 min was higher for the in Cad6−/− group (>75 kHz) than the wild-type group (<75 kHz). (B) Maximum (max) peak frequency was higher for the Cad6−/− group than either the Cad6+/− or wild-type group. (C) The number of calls during 3 min did not differ significantly in the 3 groups. (D) The latency to start calling did not differ significantly in the 3 groups. Error bars represent the SEM.</p
<p>(A) Total number of ultrasonic vocalizations, (B) total calling time, (C) duration of calls, (D) ...
To compare male and female vocal signals, bandwidth (A), duration (B), high frequency (C), low frequ...
<p>The average duration measurements were obtained from 10 mice of each genotype, averaging 10 calls...
<p>(a–c) Spectrograms (frequency, kHz * time, s) of isolation calls produced by each genotype. (A,B)...
<p>(a–c) Spectrograms (frequency, kHz * time, s) of audible vocalizations produced by each genotype....
<p>Probability of ultrasonic calls in each of the 10 different call categories in (A) pup’s isolatio...
<p>A) Number of vocalizations on postnatal day (pnd) 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12 in response to social separat...
<p>USVs were classified based on frequency (50-kHz vs. 70-kHz) and the presence of frequency jumps, ...
<p>A) Frequency of ultrasonic vocalizations at pnd 2 (post hoc p<0.05 for Het and Rl <i>vs</i> Wt). ...
<p><b><i>(A)</i></b><i>Upper panel</i>. The spectrogram of the calling song from a representative ma...
There is an error in the fifth row values for Table 1. Please see the correct Table 1 here. Addition...
<p>Time-frequency spectrogram of a female copulation call from Budongo Forest during maximum tumesce...
<p>Sample spectrogram of a simakobu loud call indicating the parameters measured in the acoustic ana...
<p>(A) Total number of ultrasonic vocalizations, (B) total calling time, (C) duration of calls, (D) ...
<p>All values represent means ± standard errors for mean values of vocalizations measured for each m...
<p>(A) Total number of ultrasonic vocalizations, (B) total calling time, (C) duration of calls, (D) ...
To compare male and female vocal signals, bandwidth (A), duration (B), high frequency (C), low frequ...
<p>The average duration measurements were obtained from 10 mice of each genotype, averaging 10 calls...
<p>(a–c) Spectrograms (frequency, kHz * time, s) of isolation calls produced by each genotype. (A,B)...
<p>(a–c) Spectrograms (frequency, kHz * time, s) of audible vocalizations produced by each genotype....
<p>Probability of ultrasonic calls in each of the 10 different call categories in (A) pup’s isolatio...
<p>A) Number of vocalizations on postnatal day (pnd) 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12 in response to social separat...
<p>USVs were classified based on frequency (50-kHz vs. 70-kHz) and the presence of frequency jumps, ...
<p>A) Frequency of ultrasonic vocalizations at pnd 2 (post hoc p<0.05 for Het and Rl <i>vs</i> Wt). ...
<p><b><i>(A)</i></b><i>Upper panel</i>. The spectrogram of the calling song from a representative ma...
There is an error in the fifth row values for Table 1. Please see the correct Table 1 here. Addition...
<p>Time-frequency spectrogram of a female copulation call from Budongo Forest during maximum tumesce...
<p>Sample spectrogram of a simakobu loud call indicating the parameters measured in the acoustic ana...
<p>(A) Total number of ultrasonic vocalizations, (B) total calling time, (C) duration of calls, (D) ...
<p>All values represent means ± standard errors for mean values of vocalizations measured for each m...
<p>(A) Total number of ultrasonic vocalizations, (B) total calling time, (C) duration of calls, (D) ...
To compare male and female vocal signals, bandwidth (A), duration (B), high frequency (C), low frequ...
<p>The average duration measurements were obtained from 10 mice of each genotype, averaging 10 calls...