<p>Major modifications in wing shape were obtained with the extreme of the CV from multivariate regression of shape variables onto CV scores.</p
<p>A: PCA of <i>N. menapia</i> wing landmarks, 95% confidences ellipses around the mean for each pop...
We estimated mutational variance-covariance matrices, M, for wing shape and size in two genotypes of...
<p>Df = Degree of freedom; Pillai = Test value; approx F = Multivariate approximation of the F-stati...
<p>The wireframe represents the average shape of each one of the analyzed lines.</p
<p>Each polygon represents a chronological sample. Relative discriminant power of each variable is b...
A) Explaining 90.3% of the variance of the data in its two first exes, ellipses = 95%CI. B–E shows t...
A total of 15 mensurations have been carried out, in both males and females, in two laboratory popul...
Statistical analysis comparison of wing size variation of C. vicina in 7 sampling areas.</p
<p>The number in parentheses indicates the number of individuals of each sex analyzed.</p
Deformations of the wing shape of males and females of Chironomus columbiensis represented in the fi...
Frequency histogram of projected C. vicina wing landmark configurations from canonical variate analy...
<p>Results of multivariate analyses of covariance examining overall body shape in <i>Ligia hawaiensi...
<p>Projection of the wing and tibia data of <i>Bactrocera invadens</i> compared with other <i>Bactro...
Comparative studies on the size of adult Lepidoptera (moths and butterflies) frequently rely on sing...
<p>The polygons represent the shape of wings projected on the first (x-axis) and second relative war...
<p>A: PCA of <i>N. menapia</i> wing landmarks, 95% confidences ellipses around the mean for each pop...
We estimated mutational variance-covariance matrices, M, for wing shape and size in two genotypes of...
<p>Df = Degree of freedom; Pillai = Test value; approx F = Multivariate approximation of the F-stati...
<p>The wireframe represents the average shape of each one of the analyzed lines.</p
<p>Each polygon represents a chronological sample. Relative discriminant power of each variable is b...
A) Explaining 90.3% of the variance of the data in its two first exes, ellipses = 95%CI. B–E shows t...
A total of 15 mensurations have been carried out, in both males and females, in two laboratory popul...
Statistical analysis comparison of wing size variation of C. vicina in 7 sampling areas.</p
<p>The number in parentheses indicates the number of individuals of each sex analyzed.</p
Deformations of the wing shape of males and females of Chironomus columbiensis represented in the fi...
Frequency histogram of projected C. vicina wing landmark configurations from canonical variate analy...
<p>Results of multivariate analyses of covariance examining overall body shape in <i>Ligia hawaiensi...
<p>Projection of the wing and tibia data of <i>Bactrocera invadens</i> compared with other <i>Bactro...
Comparative studies on the size of adult Lepidoptera (moths and butterflies) frequently rely on sing...
<p>The polygons represent the shape of wings projected on the first (x-axis) and second relative war...
<p>A: PCA of <i>N. menapia</i> wing landmarks, 95% confidences ellipses around the mean for each pop...
We estimated mutational variance-covariance matrices, M, for wing shape and size in two genotypes of...
<p>Df = Degree of freedom; Pillai = Test value; approx F = Multivariate approximation of the F-stati...
DOI
Add to ORKG