<p>Serologic tests in patients who have disagreed serotypes by three compared tests.</p
<p>The numbers of positive, negative and equivocal results of each test are shown for every region. ...
<p>Comparison of clinical symptoms and co-morbidity status among the three patient groups.</p
<p>Comparison of Pathologist H-scoring between conditions for all tested biomarkers.</p
<p>Comparison of treponemal serological tests with the results of the Serodia TP-PA.</p
Sensitivity of the tests among the vaccinated patients with simultaneous diagnostics performed, n = ...
Sensitivity of the serological tests according to different clinical characteristics.</p
Diagnostic performance of serology-based methods using different types of samples.</p
<p>Clinical and laboratory parameters of patients grouped according to infecting serotypes.</p
Sensitivity of the tests among the patients having both the tests results, n = 408.</p
Sensitivity of the tests among the patients with simultaneous diagnostics performed, n = 193.</p
Testing for a difference in proportions between the treated and non-treated populations.</p
<p>Comparison of characteristics between serological cure and serofast status.</p
<p>Comparison of participants in both treatment and control conditions who changed their opinion, in...
Comparison of mean reference ELISA index values (IVs) between individuals who had true positive vs. ...
<p>Comparison tested patients with and without a diagnosis of Whipple’s disease.</p
<p>The numbers of positive, negative and equivocal results of each test are shown for every region. ...
<p>Comparison of clinical symptoms and co-morbidity status among the three patient groups.</p
<p>Comparison of Pathologist H-scoring between conditions for all tested biomarkers.</p
<p>Comparison of treponemal serological tests with the results of the Serodia TP-PA.</p
Sensitivity of the tests among the vaccinated patients with simultaneous diagnostics performed, n = ...
Sensitivity of the serological tests according to different clinical characteristics.</p
Diagnostic performance of serology-based methods using different types of samples.</p
<p>Clinical and laboratory parameters of patients grouped according to infecting serotypes.</p
Sensitivity of the tests among the patients having both the tests results, n = 408.</p
Sensitivity of the tests among the patients with simultaneous diagnostics performed, n = 193.</p
Testing for a difference in proportions between the treated and non-treated populations.</p
<p>Comparison of characteristics between serological cure and serofast status.</p
<p>Comparison of participants in both treatment and control conditions who changed their opinion, in...
Comparison of mean reference ELISA index values (IVs) between individuals who had true positive vs. ...
<p>Comparison tested patients with and without a diagnosis of Whipple’s disease.</p
<p>The numbers of positive, negative and equivocal results of each test are shown for every region. ...
<p>Comparison of clinical symptoms and co-morbidity status among the three patient groups.</p
<p>Comparison of Pathologist H-scoring between conditions for all tested biomarkers.</p
DOI
Add to ORKG