<p>Ipsilateral S1: S1 was presented in the hemifield ipsilateral to RF; Contralateral S1: S1 was presented in the hemifield contralateral to RF. The numbers in parentheses refer to stimulus conditions in which the response to S2 alone was not tested.</p
<p>Conditioning the right S1 by electrical median nerve stimulation of the left MN (CS) resulted in ...
<p>Regions including bilateral fusiform, ipsilateral IPL and contralateral STG were more activated i...
<p>A) Experiment 2 was identical to Experiment 1 with the exception that Stimulus F<sub>1</sub> and ...
<p>Example of a single possible trial in Experiment 2 when a stimulus appeared in the upper right qu...
<p>The figure depicts a simplified overview of the different stimulus conditions. In the single cond...
<p>A) In Experiment 1, stimuli were presented individually either in the right or left visual field ...
<p>The conditions for which we expected hemifield differences are highlighted in bold font. The diff...
<p>Topographies of the components were quite comparable for both groups in the different conditions,...
<p>Timeline depicts the stimuli of 1F and 2F1G conditions in the left and right visual hemifield, re...
<p>Example of a single possible trial in Experiment 1 when a stimulus appeared in the upper right qu...
<p>The factor “motor execution” is depicted in the upper box. In the left section of that box, the e...
<p>(A) The neural responses to contralaterally and ipsilaterally presented faces, and (B) the neural...
<p>The figure depicts a simplified overview of the different conditions in Experiment 1. In the sing...
<p>Displayed are the ipsilateral and contralateral grand average waveforms for electrodes PO3/4 at e...
<p>Top: opponent motion stimulus, middle: face/house stimulus, bottom: oblique grating stimulus. The...
<p>Conditioning the right S1 by electrical median nerve stimulation of the left MN (CS) resulted in ...
<p>Regions including bilateral fusiform, ipsilateral IPL and contralateral STG were more activated i...
<p>A) Experiment 2 was identical to Experiment 1 with the exception that Stimulus F<sub>1</sub> and ...
<p>Example of a single possible trial in Experiment 2 when a stimulus appeared in the upper right qu...
<p>The figure depicts a simplified overview of the different stimulus conditions. In the single cond...
<p>A) In Experiment 1, stimuli were presented individually either in the right or left visual field ...
<p>The conditions for which we expected hemifield differences are highlighted in bold font. The diff...
<p>Topographies of the components were quite comparable for both groups in the different conditions,...
<p>Timeline depicts the stimuli of 1F and 2F1G conditions in the left and right visual hemifield, re...
<p>Example of a single possible trial in Experiment 1 when a stimulus appeared in the upper right qu...
<p>The factor “motor execution” is depicted in the upper box. In the left section of that box, the e...
<p>(A) The neural responses to contralaterally and ipsilaterally presented faces, and (B) the neural...
<p>The figure depicts a simplified overview of the different conditions in Experiment 1. In the sing...
<p>Displayed are the ipsilateral and contralateral grand average waveforms for electrodes PO3/4 at e...
<p>Top: opponent motion stimulus, middle: face/house stimulus, bottom: oblique grating stimulus. The...
<p>Conditioning the right S1 by electrical median nerve stimulation of the left MN (CS) resulted in ...
<p>Regions including bilateral fusiform, ipsilateral IPL and contralateral STG were more activated i...
<p>A) Experiment 2 was identical to Experiment 1 with the exception that Stimulus F<sub>1</sub> and ...
DOI
Add to ORKG