<p>Psychophysical vs model direction discrimination performance pooling data from nine dot density levels and five displacement levels. The thick solid line is the line of equality whilst the thin solid line is the line of best fit, where human performance = 0.79 × model performance +14% (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.91).</p
<p>Performance of the model (proportion correct responses) as a function of binocular correlation. A...
<p>Human data from five studies and full Bayesian observer's performance on the same tasks. The same...
<p>(A) Performance score and (B) excess correlations for different models with independently vari...
<p>Psychophysical (open symbols) and model (closed symbols) direction discrimination performances ar...
Comparison of model vs. human performance on the human test set (200 reports).</p
A. Decomposing model behavior into two metrics. We examined model behavior along two specific aspect...
<p>The relative measure of model performance, i.e. the per-bin log-likelihood Δ<i>p</i> (see <a href...
<p>(a) Model predictions of psychometric and chronometric functions for different values of . (b) Co...
<p>(<b>A</b>) Performance of the subjects (black line) and of the complete model (gray line) as a fu...
<p>(A) The psychophysical contrast-discrimination thresholds estimated from the P1 data using the ma...
<p>(<b>A</b>) Performance of the subjects (black line) and of the model without the memory and downs...
<p>See text for detail.</p><p>Measures of fit between human performance and model predictions for op...
<p>The columns correspond to constant, normal, log-normal and power-law ability distributions with a...
<p>Comparison of the mean optimality index computed from the data and the simulated optimality index...
<p><b>A–F</b>: A single subject's pain rating (black) and fitted models (red), for a simple stimulus...
<p>Performance of the model (proportion correct responses) as a function of binocular correlation. A...
<p>Human data from five studies and full Bayesian observer's performance on the same tasks. The same...
<p>(A) Performance score and (B) excess correlations for different models with independently vari...
<p>Psychophysical (open symbols) and model (closed symbols) direction discrimination performances ar...
Comparison of model vs. human performance on the human test set (200 reports).</p
A. Decomposing model behavior into two metrics. We examined model behavior along two specific aspect...
<p>The relative measure of model performance, i.e. the per-bin log-likelihood Δ<i>p</i> (see <a href...
<p>(a) Model predictions of psychometric and chronometric functions for different values of . (b) Co...
<p>(<b>A</b>) Performance of the subjects (black line) and of the complete model (gray line) as a fu...
<p>(A) The psychophysical contrast-discrimination thresholds estimated from the P1 data using the ma...
<p>(<b>A</b>) Performance of the subjects (black line) and of the model without the memory and downs...
<p>See text for detail.</p><p>Measures of fit between human performance and model predictions for op...
<p>The columns correspond to constant, normal, log-normal and power-law ability distributions with a...
<p>Comparison of the mean optimality index computed from the data and the simulated optimality index...
<p><b>A–F</b>: A single subject's pain rating (black) and fitted models (red), for a simple stimulus...
<p>Performance of the model (proportion correct responses) as a function of binocular correlation. A...
<p>Human data from five studies and full Bayesian observer's performance on the same tasks. The same...
<p>(A) Performance score and (B) excess correlations for different models with independently vari...