The two different orders of estimates in Experiment 1, the percentage of participants' violations of the JPD, and the latencies (in s) of participants' estimates of the three different probabilities.

Results for Experiment 1a and Experiment 1b.

Ke Zhao (248186)
Yu-Hsin Chen (362657)
Wen-Jing Yan (417480)
Xiaolan Fu (195090)

May 2013

A represents the subjects’ reported time (y-axis) for the 4 fixed intervals (x-axis) in Experimen...

Mean Error Rates (Percent Incorrect) for Experiment 1.

Zhe Chen (196097)
Yei-Yu Yeh (413042)

May 2013

Note: SS: the relevant-same-irrelevant-same condition; SD: the relevant-same-irrelevant-different...

Mean response latencies (in ms) and mean error rates (in percentages) as a function of trial type and compatibility in Experiment 2 (SE in parentheses).

Adriaan Spruyt (556091)
Jan De Houwer (302844)

October 2017

Mean response latencies (in ms) and mean error rates (in percentages) as a function of trial type...

Summary of reaction times, mean (SD), and percentages of errors in the different conditions for the two experiments.

Javier Rodríguez-Ferreiro (613166)
Llorenç Andreu (613167)
Mònica Sanz-Torrent (613168)

August 2014

Summary of reaction times, mean (SD), and percentages of errors in the different conditions for t...

Participants' mean naming latencies (M, in ms), standard errors (SE, in ms), and error rates (%) in various conditions of the four experiments.

Andus Wing-Kuen Wong (300039)
Jian Huang (7250)
Hsuan-Chih Chen (300041)

February 2013

Participants' mean naming latencies (M, in ms), standard errors (SE, in ms), and error rates (%) ...

Experiments 1 and 2: Proportion (frequency) of choosing across showups and overall.

Nina Tupper (6057683)
Melanie Sauerland (571189)
James D. Sauer (511617)
Nick J. Broers (571192)
Steve D. Charman (5769197)
Lorraine Hope (495851)

February 2019

Experiments 1 and 2: Proportion (frequency) of choosing across showups and overall.</p

Mean response latencies (in ms) and mean error rates (in percentages) as a function of response assignment and compatibility in Experiment 3 (SE in parentheses).

Adriaan Spruyt (556091)
Jan De Houwer (302844)

October 2017

Mean response latencies (in ms) and mean error rates (in percentages) as a function of response a...

Performance as a function of the trial number during the test phase.

Sara Bevacqua (395436)
Erika Cerasti (365146)
Rossella Falcone (317256)
Milena Cervelloni (395437)
Emiliano Brunamonti (317257)
Stefano Ferraina (331510)
Aldo Genovesio (317258)

March 2013

A. Performance in experiment 2 with three tokens (blue line: monkey 1; red line: monkey 2)...

Mean Error Rates (Percent Incorrect) for Experiment 3.

Zhe Chen (196097)
Yei-Yu Yeh (413042)

May 2013

Note: SS: the relevant-same-irrelevant-same condition; SD: the relevant-same-irrelevant-different...

3D scatterplots of estimates of P(A), P(B), and P(A&B) and 2D scatterplots of verbal scale (Panel A) and numerical scale (Panel B) estimates of P(A) and P(B) in Experiment 2 (see Figure 1 for an explanation of zero, one, or two violations).

Sangeet S. Khemlani (304520)
Max Lotstein (304521)
Phil Johnson-Laird (304522)

February 2013

Participants' estimates were separated by whether the estimate reflected zero, one, or two violat...

Mean Error Rates (Percent Incorrect) for Experiment 2.

Zhe Chen (196097)
Yei-Yu Yeh (413042)

May 2013

Note: SS: the relevant-same-irrelevant-same condition; SD: the relevant-same-irrelevant-different...

Percentage of Successes (Comparison to Chance, One-sample WSRT) on the First-Order and Second-Order Falsity Tasks of Study 4.

Olivier Mascaro (5665630)
Olivier Morin (816210)

October 2015

Percentage of Successes (Comparison to Chance, One-sample WSRT) on the First-Order and Second-Ord...

The average latencies of fixation on a new object and average number of trials in which onsets were fixated for all conditions in Experiment 2.

Feng Du (288665)
Yue Qi (146647)
Xingshan Li (120544)
Kan Zhang (215103)

November 2013

The average latencies of fixation on a new object and average number of trials in which onsets we...

The mean onset latencies in each condition in Experiments 1 and 2 (Session 1).

Li-Ming Zhao (843230)
Yu-Fang Yang (843231)

January 2016

The mean onset latencies in each condition in Experiments 1 and 2 (Session 1).</p

The mean onset latencies and standard deviations (in parentheses) for each condition for the RDE Experiment.

Valerie Benson (140207)
Magdalena Ietswaart (140209)
David Milner (140212)

August 2012

The mean onset latencies and standard deviations (in parentheses) for each condition for the RDE ...

Results for Experiment 1a and Experiment 1b.

Ke Zhao (248186)
Yu-Hsin Chen (362657)
Wen-Jing Yan (417480)
Xiaolan Fu (195090)

May 2013

A represents the subjects’ reported time (y-axis) for the 4 fixed intervals (x-axis) in Experimen...

Mean Error Rates (Percent Incorrect) for Experiment 1.

Zhe Chen (196097)
Yei-Yu Yeh (413042)

May 2013

Note: SS: the relevant-same-irrelevant-same condition; SD: the relevant-same-irrelevant-different...

Mean response latencies (in ms) and mean error rates (in percentages) as a function of trial type and compatibility in Experiment 2 (SE in parentheses).

Adriaan Spruyt (556091)
Jan De Houwer (302844)

October 2017

Mean response latencies (in ms) and mean error rates (in percentages) as a function of trial type...

Summary of reaction times, mean (SD), and percentages of errors in the different conditions for the two experiments.

Javier Rodríguez-Ferreiro (613166)
Llorenç Andreu (613167)
Mònica Sanz-Torrent (613168)

August 2014

Summary of reaction times, mean (SD), and percentages of errors in the different conditions for t...

Participants' mean naming latencies (M, in ms), standard errors (SE, in ms), and error rates (%) in various conditions of the four experiments.

Andus Wing-Kuen Wong (300039)
Jian Huang (7250)
Hsuan-Chih Chen (300041)

February 2013

Participants' mean naming latencies (M, in ms), standard errors (SE, in ms), and error rates (%) ...

Experiments 1 and 2: Proportion (frequency) of choosing across showups and overall.

Nina Tupper (6057683)
Melanie Sauerland (571189)
James D. Sauer (511617)
Nick J. Broers (571192)
Steve D. Charman (5769197)
Lorraine Hope (495851)

February 2019

Experiments 1 and 2: Proportion (frequency) of choosing across showups and overall.</p

Mean response latencies (in ms) and mean error rates (in percentages) as a function of response assignment and compatibility in Experiment 3 (SE in parentheses).

Adriaan Spruyt (556091)
Jan De Houwer (302844)

October 2017

Mean response latencies (in ms) and mean error rates (in percentages) as a function of response a...

Performance as a function of the trial number during the test phase.

Sara Bevacqua (395436)
Erika Cerasti (365146)
Rossella Falcone (317256)
Milena Cervelloni (395437)
Emiliano Brunamonti (317257)
Stefano Ferraina (331510)
Aldo Genovesio (317258)

March 2013

A. Performance in experiment 2 with three tokens (blue line: monkey 1; red line: monkey 2)...

Mean Error Rates (Percent Incorrect) for Experiment 3.

Zhe Chen (196097)
Yei-Yu Yeh (413042)

May 2013

Note: SS: the relevant-same-irrelevant-same condition; SD: the relevant-same-irrelevant-different...

3D scatterplots of estimates of P(A), P(B), and P(A&B) and 2D scatterplots of verbal scale (Panel A) and numerical scale (Panel B) estimates of P(A) and P(B) in Experiment 2 (see Figure 1 for an explanation of zero, one, or two violations).

Sangeet S. Khemlani (304520)
Max Lotstein (304521)
Phil Johnson-Laird (304522)

February 2013

Participants' estimates were separated by whether the estimate reflected zero, one, or two violat...

Mean Error Rates (Percent Incorrect) for Experiment 2.

Zhe Chen (196097)
Yei-Yu Yeh (413042)

May 2013

Note: SS: the relevant-same-irrelevant-same condition; SD: the relevant-same-irrelevant-different...

Percentage of Successes (Comparison to Chance, One-sample WSRT) on the First-Order and Second-Order Falsity Tasks of Study 4.

Olivier Mascaro (5665630)
Olivier Morin (816210)

October 2015

Percentage of Successes (Comparison to Chance, One-sample WSRT) on the First-Order and Second-Ord...

The average latencies of fixation on a new object and average number of trials in which onsets were fixated for all conditions in Experiment 2.

Feng Du (288665)
Yue Qi (146647)
Xingshan Li (120544)
Kan Zhang (215103)

November 2013

The average latencies of fixation on a new object and average number of trials in which onsets we...

The mean onset latencies in each condition in Experiments 1 and 2 (Session 1).

Li-Ming Zhao (843230)
Yu-Fang Yang (843231)

January 2016

The mean onset latencies in each condition in Experiments 1 and 2 (Session 1).</p

The mean onset latencies and standard deviations (in parentheses) for each condition for the RDE Experiment.

Valerie Benson (140207)
Magdalena Ietswaart (140209)
David Milner (140212)

August 2012

The mean onset latencies and standard deviations (in parentheses) for each condition for the RDE ...

Results for Experiment 1a and Experiment 1b.

Ke Zhao (248186)
Yu-Hsin Chen (362657)
Wen-Jing Yan (417480)
Xiaolan Fu (195090)

May 2013

A represents the subjects’ reported time (y-axis) for the 4 fixed intervals (x-axis) in Experimen...

Mean Error Rates (Percent Incorrect) for Experiment 1.

Zhe Chen (196097)
Yei-Yu Yeh (413042)

May 2013

Note: SS: the relevant-same-irrelevant-same condition; SD: the relevant-same-irrelevant-different...

Mean response latencies (in ms) and mean error rates (in percentages) as a function of trial type and compatibility in Experiment 2 (SE in parentheses).

Adriaan Spruyt (556091)
Jan De Houwer (302844)

October 2017

Mean response latencies (in ms) and mean error rates (in percentages) as a function of trial type...

The two different orders of estimates in Experiment 1, the percentage of participants' violations of the JPD, and the latencies (in s) of participants' estimates of the three different probabilities.

Abstract

Extracted data

The two different orders of estimates in Experiment 1, the percentage of participants' violations of the JPD, and the latencies (in s) of participants' estimates of the three different probabilities.

Abstract

Extracted data

Related items

Related items