<p>The comparison of sampling methods, area, replicate, depth, identification level, and the data used for PCA analysis of each historical data set.</p
Principle component analysis (PCA) of all samples. Low-iron samples are shown in blue, high-iron in ...
Summary of sampling dates, times, depths, and variables used in this study as part of two separate p...
<p><i>P</i>-values of comparisons between the different groups analyzed in the present study.</p
<p>Data used in the study (I), sources, methods (M), and an overview of the comparisons (C).</p
Comparative analysis of the baseline characteristics of the study sample (n = 280).</p
<p>Comparison of regression methods relative to their ability to handle different types of data prob...
<p>Comparison of the mean average precision of the MLLE, LLE, MSE, PCA and LE methods.</p
The quantitative comparison of our approach with three related works for segmentation on the two dat...
<p>Comparison between the response profiles of the clusters of the main analysis and the clusters of...
<p>Comparative strengths and weaknesses of the three sampling approaches used.</p
<p>Comparison of findings in original PCR-based sample testing and current microbiome-based analyses...
<p>Comparison of visualization techniques on the basis of typical measurement systems.</p
<p>Comparison of the average precision rates, recall rates and F1 values for the different classific...
<p>Mean comparison between High and Low groups (six animals per group) of the traits included in the...
<p>For all samples processed with a same protocol the average relative coverage was calculated and r...
Principle component analysis (PCA) of all samples. Low-iron samples are shown in blue, high-iron in ...
Summary of sampling dates, times, depths, and variables used in this study as part of two separate p...
<p><i>P</i>-values of comparisons between the different groups analyzed in the present study.</p
<p>Data used in the study (I), sources, methods (M), and an overview of the comparisons (C).</p
Comparative analysis of the baseline characteristics of the study sample (n = 280).</p
<p>Comparison of regression methods relative to their ability to handle different types of data prob...
<p>Comparison of the mean average precision of the MLLE, LLE, MSE, PCA and LE methods.</p
The quantitative comparison of our approach with three related works for segmentation on the two dat...
<p>Comparison between the response profiles of the clusters of the main analysis and the clusters of...
<p>Comparative strengths and weaknesses of the three sampling approaches used.</p
<p>Comparison of findings in original PCR-based sample testing and current microbiome-based analyses...
<p>Comparison of visualization techniques on the basis of typical measurement systems.</p
<p>Comparison of the average precision rates, recall rates and F1 values for the different classific...
<p>Mean comparison between High and Low groups (six animals per group) of the traits included in the...
<p>For all samples processed with a same protocol the average relative coverage was calculated and r...
Principle component analysis (PCA) of all samples. Low-iron samples are shown in blue, high-iron in ...
Summary of sampling dates, times, depths, and variables used in this study as part of two separate p...
<p><i>P</i>-values of comparisons between the different groups analyzed in the present study.</p