Ask
Search
My library
ORKG

ORKG Ask

Our mission is to organize scholarly knowledge and make it accessible to humans and machines.

About

About ORKG Ask
Report issue
Statistics
Contact

Legal

Terms of use
Data protection (sheet)
Imprint
Accessibility
License

Technical

We
open source
System status
Changelog
Frontend: v1.41.0
Backend: v1.13.4

We use cookies to provide a better user experience.

Data Protection

Results of Maxent model showing jackknife tests of variable importance for training samples.

Lesley H. Thorne (310122)
David W. Johnston (310123)
Dean L. Urban (119763)
Julian Tyne (310125)
Lars Bejder (310127)
Robin W. Baird (159624)
Suzanne Yin (310130)
Susan H. Rickards (310134)
Mark H. Deakos (310138)
Joseph R. Mobley Jr (310140)
Adam A. Pack (310141)
Marie Chapla Hill (310142)

Publication date

February 2013

DOI

10.1371/journal.pone.0043167.g004

Abstract

<p>Results of Maxent model showing jackknife tests of variable importance for training samples.</p

Extracted data

Topics

Related items

Results of the Jackknife Test of Environmental Variables’ Contribution in Modeling <i>P</i>. <i>tenuifolia</i>’s Potential Habitat Distribution.

Hongjun Jiang (3135291)
Ting Liu (45625)
Lin Li (28817)
Yao Zhao (317881)
Lin Pei (3135288)
Jiancheng Zhao (2560993)

September 2016

<p>The graph shows the result of the Jackknife test of variable importance using regularized trainin...

Variable importance estimated by the jackknife test.

Maite Louzao (165811)
Karine Delord (165813)
David García (165817)
Amélie Boué (165822)
Henri Weimerskirch (165827)

May 2012

<p>Bars indicate the explanatory power (in terms of gain) when only a single predictor is included i...

Performance of machine learning models on test set using the ROSE-adjusted balanced training set.

Nirajan Budhathoki (17599014)
Ramesh Bhandari (11080476)
Suraj Bashyal (17599017)
Carl Lee (17599020)

December 2023

Performance of machine learning models on test set using the ROSE-adjusted balanced training set.</p

This figure shows the results of the jackknife procedure on the full Maxent model.

February 2013

<p>This figure shows the results of the jackknife procedure on the full Maxent model.</p

Maxent jackknife test of variable importance.

Manuel de la Estrella (149387)
Rubén G. Mateo (149388)
Jan J. Wieringa (149391)
Barbara Mackinder (149394)
Jesús Muñoz (104803)

July 2012

<p>Each curve represents the regularized training gain of each variable used in isolation for each s...

Variables importance.

Alexander García Antón (6368537)
Vicente Garza (4397332)
Jorge Hernández Justribó (6368540)
Juan Traba (393009)

February 2019

Jackknife test showing the importance of each variable independently, when building the Maxent model...

Jackknife tests (%) and the mean feature numbers of the SVM-based predictors for 30 samples.

Shinn-Long Lin (803543)
Fang-Lin Chang (803544)
Shinn-Ying Ho (52368)
Phasit Charoenkwan (453383)
Kuan-Wei Wang (803545)
Hui-Ling Huang (453387)

October 2015

<p>Jackknife tests (%) and the mean feature numbers of the SVM-based predictors for 30 samples.</p

Results of jackknife test of relative importance of predictor variables for Chinese caterpillar fungus.

Uttam Babu Shrestha (164659)
Kamaljit S. Bawa (164663)

September 2014

<p>Results of jackknife test of relative importance of predictor variables for Chinese caterpillar f...

Jackknife test for all the twelve variables.

Lalit Kumar Sharma (646104)
Tanoy Mukherjee (6577076)
Phakir Chandra Saren (6577079)
Kailash Chandra (5916125)

April 2019

Blue bar = Shows importance of each variables in explaining the variation in the data when used sepa...

Results for Maxent models for each species.

Gabrielle Rudi (4789461)
Jean-Stéphane Bailly (4789464)
Fabrice Vinatier (214220)

January 2018

<p>Coefficients represent the relative importance of the explanatory variables (the sum of coefficie...

Summary of results based on the jackknife and 5-fold cross validation (5-cv) tests on the training datasets TRAIN<sub>ION</sub>, TRAIN<sub>VLG</sub> and TRAIN<sub>VGS</sub>.

Jianzhao Gao (155784)
Wei Cui (92129)
Yajun Sheng (2589580)
Jishou Ruan (73309)
Lukasz Kurgan (74173)

April 2016

<p>Summary of results based on the jackknife and 5-fold cross validation (5-cv) tests on the trainin...

Jacknife statistics of model performance and relative importance of each variable.

Sergio A. Estay (197020)
Fabio A. Labra (597575)
Roger D. Sepulveda (597576)
Leonardo D. Bacigalupe (320093)

July 2014

<p>For each species, the table shows the area under the curve (AUC) and regularized training gain (G...

Performance of machine learning models on test set using the original imbalanced training set.

Nirajan Budhathoki (17599014)
Ramesh Bhandari (11080476)
Suraj Bashyal (17599017)
Carl Lee (17599020)

December 2023

Performance of machine learning models on test set using the original imbalanced training set.</p

Relative importance of the environmental variables based on the Jackknife test.

Tarcísio Visintin da Silva Galdino (829617)
Sunil Kumar (102321)
Leonardo S. S. Oliveira (3152856)
Acelino C. Alfenas (3152853)
Lisa G. Neven (3152862)
Abdullah M. Al-Sadi (661214)
Marcelo C. Picanço (3152859)

July 2016

<p>The figures show each variable’s contribution to (A) regularized training gain, and (B) test AUC ...

The performance of different features on PDB1075 dataset (Jackknife test evaluation).

Yubo Wang (556762)
Yijie Ding (1522819)
Fei Guo (181055)
Leyi Wei (3959444)
Jijun Tang (87257)

September 2017

<p>The performance of different features on PDB1075 dataset (Jackknife test evaluation).</p

Results of the Jackknife Test of Environmental Variables’ Contribution in Modeling <i>P</i>. <i>tenuifolia</i>’s Potential Habitat Distribution.

Hongjun Jiang (3135291)
Ting Liu (45625)
Lin Li (28817)
Yao Zhao (317881)
Lin Pei (3135288)
Jiancheng Zhao (2560993)

September 2016

<p>The graph shows the result of the Jackknife test of variable importance using regularized trainin...

Variable importance estimated by the jackknife test.

Maite Louzao (165811)
Karine Delord (165813)
David García (165817)
Amélie Boué (165822)
Henri Weimerskirch (165827)

May 2012

<p>Bars indicate the explanatory power (in terms of gain) when only a single predictor is included i...

Performance of machine learning models on test set using the ROSE-adjusted balanced training set.

Nirajan Budhathoki (17599014)
Ramesh Bhandari (11080476)
Suraj Bashyal (17599017)
Carl Lee (17599020)

December 2023

Performance of machine learning models on test set using the ROSE-adjusted balanced training set.</p

This figure shows the results of the jackknife procedure on the full Maxent model.

February 2013

<p>This figure shows the results of the jackknife procedure on the full Maxent model.</p

Maxent jackknife test of variable importance.

Manuel de la Estrella (149387)
Rubén G. Mateo (149388)
Jan J. Wieringa (149391)
Barbara Mackinder (149394)
Jesús Muñoz (104803)

July 2012

<p>Each curve represents the regularized training gain of each variable used in isolation for each s...

Variables importance.

Alexander García Antón (6368537)
Vicente Garza (4397332)
Jorge Hernández Justribó (6368540)
Juan Traba (393009)

February 2019

Jackknife test showing the importance of each variable independently, when building the Maxent model...

Jackknife tests (%) and the mean feature numbers of the SVM-based predictors for 30 samples.

Shinn-Long Lin (803543)
Fang-Lin Chang (803544)
Shinn-Ying Ho (52368)
Phasit Charoenkwan (453383)
Kuan-Wei Wang (803545)
Hui-Ling Huang (453387)

October 2015

<p>Jackknife tests (%) and the mean feature numbers of the SVM-based predictors for 30 samples.</p

Results of jackknife test of relative importance of predictor variables for Chinese caterpillar fungus.

Uttam Babu Shrestha (164659)
Kamaljit S. Bawa (164663)

September 2014

<p>Results of jackknife test of relative importance of predictor variables for Chinese caterpillar f...

Jackknife test for all the twelve variables.

Lalit Kumar Sharma (646104)
Tanoy Mukherjee (6577076)
Phakir Chandra Saren (6577079)
Kailash Chandra (5916125)

April 2019

Blue bar = Shows importance of each variables in explaining the variation in the data when used sepa...

Results for Maxent models for each species.

Gabrielle Rudi (4789461)
Jean-Stéphane Bailly (4789464)
Fabrice Vinatier (214220)

January 2018

<p>Coefficients represent the relative importance of the explanatory variables (the sum of coefficie...

Summary of results based on the jackknife and 5-fold cross validation (5-cv) tests on the training datasets TRAIN<sub>ION</sub>, TRAIN<sub>VLG</sub> and TRAIN<sub>VGS</sub>.

Jianzhao Gao (155784)
Wei Cui (92129)
Yajun Sheng (2589580)
Jishou Ruan (73309)
Lukasz Kurgan (74173)

April 2016

<p>Summary of results based on the jackknife and 5-fold cross validation (5-cv) tests on the trainin...

Jacknife statistics of model performance and relative importance of each variable.

Sergio A. Estay (197020)
Fabio A. Labra (597575)
Roger D. Sepulveda (597576)
Leonardo D. Bacigalupe (320093)

July 2014

<p>For each species, the table shows the area under the curve (AUC) and regularized training gain (G...

Performance of machine learning models on test set using the original imbalanced training set.

Nirajan Budhathoki (17599014)
Ramesh Bhandari (11080476)
Suraj Bashyal (17599017)
Carl Lee (17599020)

December 2023

Performance of machine learning models on test set using the original imbalanced training set.</p

Relative importance of the environmental variables based on the Jackknife test.

Tarcísio Visintin da Silva Galdino (829617)
Sunil Kumar (102321)
Leonardo S. S. Oliveira (3152856)
Acelino C. Alfenas (3152853)
Lisa G. Neven (3152862)
Abdullah M. Al-Sadi (661214)
Marcelo C. Picanço (3152859)

July 2016

<p>The figures show each variable’s contribution to (A) regularized training gain, and (B) test AUC ...

The performance of different features on PDB1075 dataset (Jackknife test evaluation).

Yubo Wang (556762)
Yijie Ding (1522819)
Fei Guo (181055)
Leyi Wei (3959444)
Jijun Tang (87257)

September 2017

<p>The performance of different features on PDB1075 dataset (Jackknife test evaluation).</p

Results of the Jackknife Test of Environmental Variables’ Contribution in Modeling <i>P</i>. <i>tenuifolia</i>’s Potential Habitat Distribution.

Hongjun Jiang (3135291)
Ting Liu (45625)
Lin Li (28817)
Yao Zhao (317881)
Lin Pei (3135288)
Jiancheng Zhao (2560993)

September 2016

<p>The graph shows the result of the Jackknife test of variable importance using regularized trainin...

Variable importance estimated by the jackknife test.

Maite Louzao (165811)
Karine Delord (165813)
David García (165817)
Amélie Boué (165822)
Henri Weimerskirch (165827)

May 2012

<p>Bars indicate the explanatory power (in terms of gain) when only a single predictor is included i...

Performance of machine learning models on test set using the ROSE-adjusted balanced training set.

Nirajan Budhathoki (17599014)
Ramesh Bhandari (11080476)
Suraj Bashyal (17599017)
Carl Lee (17599020)

December 2023

Performance of machine learning models on test set using the ROSE-adjusted balanced training set.</p