<p>Results of random effects analysis for 1PP (1PP-baseline) relative to 3PP (3PP baseline) (p<0.05, FWE corrected, L = left hemisphere, R = right hemisphere, masked with real touch>baseline).</p
<p>Random-effects (RE) model. Odds ratio (OR) estimates with the corresponding 95% confidence interv...
<p>(top) Low-pass-filtered (at 8 Hz) response of the left hemisphere to neutral sounds (a trace from...
<p>Heterogeneity chi-squared = 11.91 (d.f. = 6), <i>P</i> = 0.064; test of RR = 1∶z = 4.29, <i>P</i>...
<p>Results of random effects analysis (p<0.05, FWE corrected, L = left hemisphere, R = right hemisph...
<p>Results of random effects analysis (p<0.05, corrected, L = left hemisphere, R = right hemisphere...
<p>Results of random effects analysis (at p<0.05, FDR corrected, L = left hemisphere, R = right hemi...
<p>Results show brain activation in SI for 1PP (at p<0.05, FWE corrected, masked with real touch>bas...
<p>(A) Correlation between normalized effect size and mean sample size. No correlation is found (r =...
<p>Correlation between corrected effect size r and sample size for different statistical analysis ca...
<p>Effect size calculations for tests that were significantly different at Baseline vs. End of A and...
Random effects pooled correlation coefficients of path a, path b, indirect effect and total effect; ...
<p>(a) The curves show the bias by our algorithms at different . (b–d) The figures show the prestige...
<p><i>Note:</i> The symbols ‘>’ denote that the relative theta power given by the channels or stimul...
<p>Note: Size of priming effect (ms) = RT on Different prime trials-RT on Same prime trials. <sup>*<...
<p>RT analyses: Statistical comparisons of Stroop, interference, and facilitation effects, after Bon...
<p>Random-effects (RE) model. Odds ratio (OR) estimates with the corresponding 95% confidence interv...
<p>(top) Low-pass-filtered (at 8 Hz) response of the left hemisphere to neutral sounds (a trace from...
<p>Heterogeneity chi-squared = 11.91 (d.f. = 6), <i>P</i> = 0.064; test of RR = 1∶z = 4.29, <i>P</i>...
<p>Results of random effects analysis (p<0.05, FWE corrected, L = left hemisphere, R = right hemisph...
<p>Results of random effects analysis (p<0.05, corrected, L = left hemisphere, R = right hemisphere...
<p>Results of random effects analysis (at p<0.05, FDR corrected, L = left hemisphere, R = right hemi...
<p>Results show brain activation in SI for 1PP (at p<0.05, FWE corrected, masked with real touch>bas...
<p>(A) Correlation between normalized effect size and mean sample size. No correlation is found (r =...
<p>Correlation between corrected effect size r and sample size for different statistical analysis ca...
<p>Effect size calculations for tests that were significantly different at Baseline vs. End of A and...
Random effects pooled correlation coefficients of path a, path b, indirect effect and total effect; ...
<p>(a) The curves show the bias by our algorithms at different . (b–d) The figures show the prestige...
<p><i>Note:</i> The symbols ‘>’ denote that the relative theta power given by the channels or stimul...
<p>Note: Size of priming effect (ms) = RT on Different prime trials-RT on Same prime trials. <sup>*<...
<p>RT analyses: Statistical comparisons of Stroop, interference, and facilitation effects, after Bon...
<p>Random-effects (RE) model. Odds ratio (OR) estimates with the corresponding 95% confidence interv...
<p>(top) Low-pass-filtered (at 8 Hz) response of the left hemisphere to neutral sounds (a trace from...
<p>Heterogeneity chi-squared = 11.91 (d.f. = 6), <i>P</i> = 0.064; test of RR = 1∶z = 4.29, <i>P</i>...