<p>All pairwise differences between conditions are statistically significant except those bars joined by dashed lines in the bottom <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0037791#pone-0037791-g005" target="_blank">figure (5</a>% significance level).</p
<p>The classification accuracy is plotted over different number of training samples. For a given num...
<p>The left panel depicts choice accuracy of the <i>Mixed-Training</i> condition (circles), separate...
<p>(<b>a</b>) Prediction performance of the classifier at individual level (PAM; P<i>i</i> indicates...
<p>Results shown are for the case of 6-fold cross validation, which corresponds to a training sample...
<p>Mean classification accuracy across participants (and standard error) as a function of number of ...
<p>Average classification accuracy for the different methods; error bars show Confidence Interval. T...
<p>Each gray line shows the accuracy difference when one subject’s deceptive data is used as test, a...
<p>(A) Group mean thresholds for training. Solid lines are least squares logarithmic fits. Error bar...
<p>(dot, average accuracy statistics of the 50 random samples; error bar, one standard deviation awa...
<p>The classification accuracy is plotted over different number of training samples. For a given num...
<p>(A) Classification accuracy when the number of channels was reduced. The bold black, red, and blu...
<p>Group mean DLFs after the first 800 trials for groups T800, T400 and T200 from Experiment 1 (see ...
<p>A. Classification model fot target detection built from the Color Luminance experiment and used t...
<p>Abbreviations: TP – number of true positives, FN-false negatives, FP-false positives, TN-true neg...
<p>a) Classification rates for native and non-native participants for each of the three stimulus con...
<p>The classification accuracy is plotted over different number of training samples. For a given num...
<p>The left panel depicts choice accuracy of the <i>Mixed-Training</i> condition (circles), separate...
<p>(<b>a</b>) Prediction performance of the classifier at individual level (PAM; P<i>i</i> indicates...
<p>Results shown are for the case of 6-fold cross validation, which corresponds to a training sample...
<p>Mean classification accuracy across participants (and standard error) as a function of number of ...
<p>Average classification accuracy for the different methods; error bars show Confidence Interval. T...
<p>Each gray line shows the accuracy difference when one subject’s deceptive data is used as test, a...
<p>(A) Group mean thresholds for training. Solid lines are least squares logarithmic fits. Error bar...
<p>(dot, average accuracy statistics of the 50 random samples; error bar, one standard deviation awa...
<p>The classification accuracy is plotted over different number of training samples. For a given num...
<p>(A) Classification accuracy when the number of channels was reduced. The bold black, red, and blu...
<p>Group mean DLFs after the first 800 trials for groups T800, T400 and T200 from Experiment 1 (see ...
<p>A. Classification model fot target detection built from the Color Luminance experiment and used t...
<p>Abbreviations: TP – number of true positives, FN-false negatives, FP-false positives, TN-true neg...
<p>a) Classification rates for native and non-native participants for each of the three stimulus con...
<p>The classification accuracy is plotted over different number of training samples. For a given num...
<p>The left panel depicts choice accuracy of the <i>Mixed-Training</i> condition (circles), separate...
<p>(<b>a</b>) Prediction performance of the classifier at individual level (PAM; P<i>i</i> indicates...